RE: [Asterisk-Users] txfax problem

2006-03-27 Thread Technical Support



James,

Which fax application are you 
using?

MD


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James 
HawksSent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:29 PMTo: 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] txfax 
problem

I can not get txfax to work with a multiple page 
tiff image. It works fine with a single page tiff image. Has anyone had this 
problem before and if so is there a fix? 


Thank You,James HawksCTO 
CustomerFunding.com Inc.(877) 784-1030 
x206
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax problem

2006-03-27 Thread James Hawks



I am using Asterfax but I also tried the following 
with the same results:

[macro-testfax]exten = 
s,1,Set(FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/QWWWxx1.tif))exten = 
s,2,txfax(${FAXFILE}|caller)

[default]exten = 7001,1,Answerexten 
= 7001,n,Dial(ZAP/97/94805175098|30|gM(testfax))exten = 
7001,n,Hangupexten = 7001,102,Congestion


I did this to see if Asterfax was the problem or it 
was txfax. It seems to be txfax or the tif file. I also tried using a fax 
machine attached to my asterisk server and the fax went through with no problems 
so that eliminated a hardware issue with my Digium cards.


Thank You,James HawksCTO CustomerFunding.com Inc.(877) 784-1030 
x206

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Technical Support 
  
  To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - 
  Non-Commercial Discussion' 
  Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:31 
PM
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] txfax 
  problem
  
  James,
  
  Which fax application are you 
  using?
  
  MD
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James 
  HawksSent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:29 PMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: 
  [Asterisk-Users] txfax problem
  
  I can not get txfax to work with a multiple page 
  tiff image. It works fine with a single page tiff image. Has anyone had this 
  problem before and if so is there a fix? 
  
  
  Thank You,James HawksCTO 
  CustomerFunding.com Inc.(877) 784-1030 x206
  
  

  ___--Bandwidth and 
  Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing 
  listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Vladyslav,
Use 0.0.2pre1, but add the line
   fax.verbose = TRUE;
just after
   fax_init(fax, calling_party, NULL);
That will turn on the detailed logging.
Is the listing you posted the entire log? It looks like there should be 
more.

One common mistake people make - Did you use the |caller parameter 
when running txfax?

Regards,
Steve
Vladyslav wrote:
Hi Ppl.
Once, couple weeks ago when I have updated * from CVS-HEAD something
happen and I could not send a fax anymore.
After that I have tried previous * CVS versions with different versions
of spandsp (0.0.1, 0.0.2pre4, 0.0.2pre10) but without any changes.
I have tried that on Fedora Core 2 with libtiff-3.5.7-16.1 and
libtiff-devel-3.5.7-16.1. Everything compiles smoothly, but when I try
to send a fax it tries to negotiate and than hangup (on fax machine -
incomplete), also tried to send to another fax machine (but result was
the same). 
I get back to spandsp-0.0.1 because that one has at least a bit more
debug output than 0.0.2pre10.
and here what I got:

Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote is made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 4
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 XCN: fa
XCN with final frame tag
In state 4
Disconnecting
Changed from phase 3 to 7
Does anyone have a clue what it could be ?
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladyslav
Thx for your reply.

On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 17:35, Steve Underwood wrote:
 Hi Vladyslav,
 
 Use 0.0.2pre1, but add the line
 fax.verbose = TRUE;
 just after
 fax_init(fax, calling_party, NULL);
 
 That will turn on the detailed logging.
 
Added, recompiled and tested again.
 Is the listing you posted the entire log? It looks like there should be 
 more.
 
Yes, before there was some additional information 
 One common mistake people make - Did you use the |caller parameter 
 when running txfax?
yes I use that one.

 Regards,
 Steve
 
Here is new one : (but it's spandsp-0.0.2pre10)

*CLI -- Executing NoOp(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
-- Executing AGI(SIP/103-dfb6, set-timestamp.agi) in new stack
-- Executing System(SIP/103-dfb6, echo 16032005-18:15:06 -
VladK 103 - SIP/103-dfb6 - 901  /var/log/asterisk/calls) in new
stack
-- Executing DBput(SIP/103-dfb6, RepeatDial/103=901) in new
stack
-- DBput: family=RepeatDial, key=103, value=901
-- Executing DBget(SIP/103-dfb6, recv=Record/103) in new stack
-- DBget: varname=recv, family=Record, key=103
-- DBget: set variable recv to on
-- Executing GotoIf(SIP/103-dfb6, 1?7:9) in new stack
-- Goto (from-sip,901,7)
-- Executing SetVar(SIP/103-dfb6,
CALLFILENAME=20050316-181506-103-901) in new stack
-- Executing Monitor(SIP/103-dfb6, wav|20050316-181506-103-901)
in new stack
-- Executing Goto(SIP/103-dfb6, from-sip-post|901|1) in new
stack
-- Goto (from-sip-post,901,1)
-- Executing Answer(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
-- Executing TxFAX(SIP/103-dfb6, /tmp/testfax.tif|caller) in new
stack
Slow carrier up
Mar 16 18:15:10 NOTICE[10168]: rtp.c:540 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec
100 received
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote was made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
  V.8 capable
  Prefer 256 octet blocks
  Can receive fax
  Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm or 255mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 5ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  Error correction mode
  R8x15.4lines/mm
  Metric-based resolution preferred
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
DCS:
  Can receive fax
  Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm)
  Minimum scan line time: 20ms
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4
 DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
 CFR: 84
CFR with final frame tag
In state 4
Trainability test succeeded
Start tx page
Slow carrier down
Changed from phase 3 to 6

*CLI show ch
channel   channels  channeltypes
*CLI show channels
Channel  (ContextExtensionPri )   State Appl.
Data
0 active channel(s)


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Vladyslav,
The log looks good so far. The far end has negotiated. The fast modem 
has been tested. Transmission of the first page has been. What happens 
next. I don't think the log really stopped at that point. Did you wait 
long enough for the page transmission to complete?

Regards,
Steve
Vladyslav wrote:
Here is new one : (but it's spandsp-0.0.2pre10)
*CLI -- Executing NoOp(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
   -- Executing AGI(SIP/103-dfb6, set-timestamp.agi) in new stack
   -- Executing System(SIP/103-dfb6, echo 16032005-18:15:06 -
VladK 103 - SIP/103-dfb6 - 901  /var/log/asterisk/calls) in new
stack
   -- Executing DBput(SIP/103-dfb6, RepeatDial/103=901) in new
stack
   -- DBput: family=RepeatDial, key=103, value=901
   -- Executing DBget(SIP/103-dfb6, recv=Record/103) in new stack
   -- DBget: varname=recv, family=Record, key=103
   -- DBget: set variable recv to on
   -- Executing GotoIf(SIP/103-dfb6, 1?7:9) in new stack
   -- Goto (from-sip,901,7)
   -- Executing SetVar(SIP/103-dfb6,
CALLFILENAME=20050316-181506-103-901) in new stack
   -- Executing Monitor(SIP/103-dfb6, wav|20050316-181506-103-901)
in new stack
   -- Executing Goto(SIP/103-dfb6, from-sip-post|901|1) in new
stack
   -- Goto (from-sip-post,901,1)
   -- Executing Answer(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
   -- Executing TxFAX(SIP/103-dfb6, /tmp/testfax.tif|caller) in new
stack
Slow carrier up
Mar 16 18:15:10 NOTICE[10168]: rtp.c:540 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec
100 received
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote was made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
 V.8 capable
 Prefer 256 octet blocks
 Can receive fax
 Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm or 255mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
 Receiver's minimum scan line time: 5ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
 Error correction mode
 R8x15.4lines/mm
 Metric-based resolution preferred
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
DCS:
 Can receive fax
 Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm)
 Minimum scan line time: 20ms
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4
 

DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
   

HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
 CFR: 84
CFR with final frame tag
In state 4
Trainability test succeeded
Start tx page
Slow carrier down
Changed from phase 3 to 6
*CLI show ch
channel   channels  channeltypes
*CLI show channels
   Channel  (ContextExtensionPri )   State Appl.
Data
0 active channel(s)
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladyslav
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 18:25, Steve Underwood wrote:
 Hi Vladyslav,
 
 The log looks good so far. The far end has negotiated. The fast modem 
 has been tested. Transmission of the first page has been. What happens 
 next. I don't think the log really stopped at that point. Did you wait 
 long enough for the page transmission to complete?

After that point Changed from phase 3 to 6 
fax machine says Incomplete + error code.
And that's all.

BTW, Fax machine connected via SIPURA-2000 (which registered directly on
* and use ulaw)
But I could receive fax from PSTN via *-SIPURA-Fax machine
 
 
 Regards,
 Steve
 
 
 Vladyslav wrote:
 
 Here is new one : (but it's spandsp-0.0.2pre10)
 
 *CLI -- Executing NoOp(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
 -- Executing AGI(SIP/103-dfb6, set-timestamp.agi) in new stack
 -- Executing System(SIP/103-dfb6, echo 16032005-18:15:06 -
 VladK 103 - SIP/103-dfb6 - 901  /var/log/asterisk/calls) in new
 stack
 -- Executing DBput(SIP/103-dfb6, RepeatDial/103=901) in new
 stack
 -- DBput: family=RepeatDial, key=103, value=901
 -- Executing DBget(SIP/103-dfb6, recv=Record/103) in new stack
 -- DBget: varname=recv, family=Record, key=103
 -- DBget: set variable recv to on
 -- Executing GotoIf(SIP/103-dfb6, 1?7:9) in new stack
 -- Goto (from-sip,901,7)
 -- Executing SetVar(SIP/103-dfb6,
 CALLFILENAME=20050316-181506-103-901) in new stack
 -- Executing Monitor(SIP/103-dfb6, wav|20050316-181506-103-901)
 in new stack
 -- Executing Goto(SIP/103-dfb6, from-sip-post|901|1) in new
 stack
 -- Goto (from-sip-post,901,1)
 -- Executing Answer(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
 -- Executing TxFAX(SIP/103-dfb6, /tmp/testfax.tif|caller) in new
 stack
 Slow carrier up
 Mar 16 18:15:10 NOTICE[10168]: rtp.c:540 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec
 100 received
 Slow carrier down
 Slow carrier up
 Slow carrier down
 Slow carrier up
  NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
 01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
 NSF without final frame tag
 The remote was made by 'Panasonic'
  DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
 DIS with final frame tag
 In state 10
 DIS:
   V.8 capable
   Prefer 256 octet blocks
   Can receive fax
   Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
   R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
   2D coding
   Scan line length: 215mm or 255mm
   Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
   Receiver's minimum scan line time: 5ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
   Error correction mode
   R8x15.4lines/mm
   Metric-based resolution preferred
   Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 DCS:
   Can receive fax
   Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
   2D coding
   Scan line length: 215mm
   Recording length: A4 (297mm)
   Minimum scan line time: 20ms
   Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 Start sending document
 Start tx document
 Changed from phase 2 to 4
   
 
 DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
 
 
 HDLC underflow in state 3
 Changed from phase 4 to 6
 Changed from phase 6 to 3
 Slow carrier up
  CFR: 84
 CFR with final frame tag
 In state 4
 Trainability test succeeded
 Start tx page
 Slow carrier down
 Changed from phase 3 to 6
 
 *CLI show ch
 channel   channels  channeltypes
 *CLI show channels
 Channel  (ContextExtensionPri )   State Appl.
 Data
 0 active channel(s)
   
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax problem?

2004-11-08 Thread Steve Underwood
Michael Welter wrote:
In my dial plan, I have
exten = 160,1,txfax(${FILENAME})
When I dial 160 from a fax machine, I hear a broken dial tone.  The 
processor utilization goes to 100%, and the following pair of messages 
is displayed at the console:
100% CPU utilisation is not normal, unless you have a 16MHz 386 
processor. :-)

Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
This pair of messages repeats until I push the Start key on the fax. 
At this point things return to normal and the fax is sent to the machine.

Is this how it should work?  I'm using asterisk-1.0.2 and spandsp-0.0.1k
It may be the settings of your FAX machine. Some won't go into receive 
mode when they are the caller, unless special action is taken. Was there 
any document in the FAX machine's send tray? Some refuse to receive 
until they have finished sending. When I call into txfax with a fax 
machine the machine receives OK.

Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users