Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between Application Set and Function SET?

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Jonathan H wrote: > OK, thanks. That sort of makes sense. Is it case sensitive? > Is what case sensitive? Function names are case sensitive. Application names have historically been not case sensitive. > > Bonus quickie while I'm here

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between Application Set and Function SET?

OK, thanks. That sort of makes sense. Is it case sensitive? Bonus quickie while I'm here (not worth own thread) - Asterisklint complains that: H_PAT_NON_CANONICAL: pattern '_#' is not in the canonical form '#' for the line exten => _#,1,Goto(s,1) I'm sure I read somewhere it should be _#. Am

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between Application Set and Function SET?

> It was only when I ran AsteriskLint over my dialplan that I noticed this: > > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+14+Application_Set > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+14+Function_SET > > Hmmm, they both seem to do the same thing. Or don't they? In some

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between Application Set and Function SET?

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Jonathan H wrote: > It was only when I ran AsteriskLint over my dialplan that I noticed this: > > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+14+Application_Set > https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+14+Function_SET

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

It looks like your database configuration is missing in Asterisk. It is making up information about the connection using defaault values as if it did not find any database configuration. Ron On 03/06/2013 10:49 AM, Olivier CALVANO wrote: Hi i have installed a new Asterisk server on

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

The database schema (table) is different in Asterisk 11.4 ? because i have configured: cdr_mysql.conf extconfig.conf res_config_mysql.conf and on the mysql server, it's the old database of 1.6.x i see: [Jun 3 16:27:59] ERROR[3140] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime: Failed to connect

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

Strange too, in the logs: [Jun 3 17:09:49] WARNING[3464] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime: No database user found, using 'asterisk' as default. [Jun 3 17:09:49] WARNING[3464] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime: No database password found, using 'asterisk' as default. [Jun 3 17:09:49]

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

Fix this. [Jun 3 17:09:49] WARNING[3464] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime: No database user found, using 'asterisk' as default. [Jun 3 17:09:49] WARNING[3464] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime: No database password found, using 'asterisk' as default. [Jun 3 17:09:49] WARNING[3464]

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

No other idea ? 2013/6/3 Olivier CALVANO o.calv...@gmail.com Hi i have installed a new Asterisk server on Fedora. My first server use Asterisk 1.6.x with a MySQL CDR and realtime. I have a small problems, when i configure on the new server, the same information in MySQL, we have a

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

Thanks for your help Ron, Do you know where is the confirguration ? Because i have put into res_config_mysql.conf: [general] dbhost = myhost.mydomain.net dbname = MyDB dbuser = MyUser dbpass = MyPassword dbport = 3306 dbsock = /tmp/mysql.sock dbcharset = latin1 requirements = warn after in

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

Hello, are you sure MySQL socket is in /tmp directory? dbsock = /tmp/mysql.sock Regards El 03/06/2013 12:16, Olivier CALVANO escribió: Thanks for your help Ron, Do you know where is the confirguration ? Because i have put into res_config_mysql.conf: [general] dbhost = myhost.mydomain.net

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

on this server we don't have mysql.socket because he don't have mysql server we want access to a mysql based on a other server 2013/6/3 Bakko asannu...@gmail.com Hello, are you sure MySQL socket is in /tmp directory? dbsock = /tmp/mysql.sock Regards El 03/06/2013 12:16, Olivier

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

asterisk trying connect to mysql via socket remove that line from config files. 1 check if port 3306 is open in iptables on both servers. 2 check permissions on db for user Asterisk. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Olivier CALVANO o.calv...@gmail.com wrote: on this server we don't have

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

Do you have this problem in your conf file? http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?p=63736 The parser won't accept an ; (semicolon) for remarks! So he found at the first the old remarks and tried to access my database with the false data. Ron On 03/06/2013 3:18 PM, Olivier CALVANO

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

oh ron thanks for your help : We have deleted all commented line, only put the configuration and now that's work ! 2013/6/3 Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com Do you have this problem in your conf file? http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?p=63736 The parser won't accept an ;

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

grrr no in asterisk -d i have no error, but when i start normaly asterisk i have : [Jun 4 02:01:45] ERROR[6563] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime: Failed to connect database server xxx on xxx.xxx.net (err 2003). Check debug for more info. [Jun 4 02:01:45] ERROR[6563] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

Well, at least you are making progress. What is the error in the debug log? Ron On 03/06/2013 8:03 PM, Olivier CALVANO wrote: grrr no in asterisk -d i have no error, but when i start normaly asterisk i have : [Jun 4 02:01:45] ERROR[6563] res_config_mysql.c: MySQL RealTime: Failed to

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference MySQL between 1.6.x and 11.4.x

What is the best commande for put the debug ? because with core set debug, i don't have a return. voip-2*CLI realtime mysql status Vop configured for m...@myhost.mydomain.net, port 3306 with username Asterisk. [Jun 4 06:48:25] ERROR[27879]: res_config_mysql.c:1577 mysql_reconnect: MySQL

Re: [asterisk-users] difference between playback and background?

Alternatively, if you don't have that extension defined anywhere, Asterisk will jump to the i extension, where you can then read the actual entered digits from the INVALID_EXTEN variable and jump back to the main part of the dialplan. Note that if they enter digits that *could* match a defined

Re: [asterisk-users] difference between playback and background?

It sounds like you may want to use the READ command instead. This lets you hard-set the number of digits to expect and then sets a variable which you can use later in the dialplan. Generally you use the background command to let them dial an extension or automated attendant option. Playback

Re: [asterisk-users] difference between playback and background?

First question - playback is not interruptable by DTMF, background is. You have two options here Option 1 Use Read [getnum] Exten = start,1,read(mydigit,prompt,4,skip,1,2) .. verification stuff Option 2 Use WaitExten with Background [getnum] Exten = start,1,background(prompt) Exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] difference between playback and background?

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Danny Nicholas wrote: Option 2 Use WaitExten with Background [getnum] Exten = start,1,background(prompt) Exten = start,n,waitexten(2) Exten = ,1,noop(user pressed ) Exten = I,1,playback(invalid) For option 2 you have to define each valid 4 digit entry in the

Re: [asterisk-users] difference between SIP peer and SIP user ?

Hi James, Thanks I give me the clear view and now I am able to describe that. again thank a lot 2011/5/23 James zhu zhulizh...@live.com hello: please refer this link: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SIP+user+vs+peer Best regards, James.zhu Doing asterisk/PRI/ss7/dahdi,

Re: [asterisk-users] difference between SIP peer and SIP user ?

Hi James, My question was related to CLI commands not sip.conf type value(friends,peer,user) main question was difference below commands *sip show peers* Vs *sip show user* On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 1:28 PM, virendra bhati virbh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi James, Thanks I give me the clear view

Re: [asterisk-users] difference between SIP peer and SIP user ?

hello: please refer this link: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SIP+user+vs+peer Best regards, James.zhu Doing asterisk/PRI/ss7/dahdi, linux, asterisk cards, gateway(fxs/fxo/pri-SIP). website: www.voipviews.com Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 17:49:37 +0530 From: virbh...@gmail.com To:

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Difference Is there any major architectural difference between 1.4 and 1.8? The dialplan uses the 1.6 nomenclature (delimiter in dialplan changes from , to |) and the AGI structure is enhanced. If you don’t use AGI’s, a qualified “not really

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

_ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rizwan Hisham Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:15 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Difference Hi All, Please can

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

Is there any major architectural difference between 1.4 and 1.8? On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: -- *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Rizwan

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:44 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Difference Is there any major architectural difference between 1.4 and 1.8? The dialplan uses the 1.6 nomenclature (delimiter in dialplan changes from , to |) and the AGI

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Rizwan Hisham wrote: Is there any major architectural difference between 1.4 and 1.8? Nope. The developer's just got tired of typing .4 Of course, the joke's on them -- 1.8 is only .4 better than 1.4. -- Thanks in advance,

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Difference Is there any major architectural difference between 1.4 and 1.8? The dialplan uses the 1.6 nomenclature (delimiter in dialplan changes from , to |) and the AGI structure is enhanced. If you don’t use

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

Back in the days i heard that they have changed the architecture in 1.6 and its a lot better than 1.4 (6 times better call handling and robust architecture, someone told me). If they have decided to take the 1.6 architecture to the next level in the new 1.8 version then its a good thing. On Wed,

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

Here is a presentation from Kevin P. Fleming, Director of Software Technologies at Digium. Information might be old by now still gives a good overview of what is new in 1.6: http://www.asterisk-tag.org/2008/slides/Kevin-Fleming-Asterisk-Tag-2008.pdf Summary of his presentation is as follows: –

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Rizwan Hisham *Sent:* Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:44 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Difference Is there any major

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 'core show channels' and 'sip show channels' ??

On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, jonas kellens wrote: vps*CLI iax2 show channels Channel Peer UsernameID (Lo/Rem) Seq (Tx/Rx) Lag Jitter JitBuf Format 0 active IAX channels vps*CLI core show channels Channel Location State

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x?

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Michael Cunninghammichael.cunningham@gmail.com wrote: Forgive me if this is a FAQ question but I didnt see anything on the website of forum spelling out the difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x Obviously 1.6.x is in development. Is it stable enough for

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x?

For changes between 1.4 and 1.6 you might find useful this one: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/tags/1.6.0/CHANGES For changes between 1.6 branches: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/tags/1.6.1.0/CHANGES http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/tags/1.6.2.0-beta1/CHANGES Regards Jose 2009/8/4

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x?

1.6.0 is stable 1.6.1 is stable 1.6.2 is release candidate See the files Changelog* and UPDATE* in this distributions for changes. regards klaus Michael Cunningham schrieb: Forgive me if this is a FAQ question but I didnt see anything on the website of forum spelling out the difference

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x?

Klaus Darilion wrote: 1.6.0 is stable 1.6.1 is stable 1.6.2 is release candidate See the files Changelog* and UPDATE* in this distributions for changes. Actually, almost... 1.6.0 is in release status 1.6.1 is in release status 1.6.2 is in beta status (soon release candidate) That's a more

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x?

, August 04, 2009 8:18 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x? Klaus Darilion wrote: 1.6.0 is stable 1.6.1 is stable 1.6.2 is release candidate See the files Changelog* and UPDATE* in this distributions

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x?

On Tuesday 04 August 2009 08:22:52 Danny Nicholas wrote: Ok. What's the difference between stable and in release status? Does the hierarchy go beta, stable, release candidate, release status? We don't actually use the word stable because it's a loaded word and leads to poor expectations. In

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x?

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:45:13AM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Tuesday 04 August 2009 08:22:52 Danny Nicholas wrote: Ok. What's the difference between stable and in release status? Does the hierarchy go beta, stable, release candidate, release status? We don't actually use the word

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x?

Michael Cunningham wrote: Forgive me if this is a FAQ question but I didnt see anything on the website of forum spelling out the difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x Obviously 1.6.x is in development. Is it stable enough for production use? What are the new features being implemented in

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between 1.4.x and 1.6.x?

Thanks Leif, That cleared up the versioning.. Is there a list of new features in 1.6.x versus the 1.4.x version? On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Leif Madsen leif.mad...@asteriskdocs.orgwrote: Michael Cunningham wrote: Forgive me if this is a FAQ question but I didnt see anything on the

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between DAHDI/G1/0123456789 and DAHDI/g1/0123456789

Olivier wrote: Hello, Groups in asterisk are summarized here ( http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Channels+and+Groups). Is there any difference between DAHDI/G1/0123456789 and DAHDI/g1/0123456789 (as I've been advised in another thread, to switch from one notation to the other and I can't

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between DAHDI/G1/0123456789 and DAHDI/g1/0123456789

Olivier wrote: Hello, Groups in asterisk are summarized here (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Channels+and+Groups). Is there any difference between DAHDI/G1/0123456789 and DAHDI/g1/0123456789 (as I've been advised in another thread, to switch from one notation to the other and I

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between DAHDI/G1/0123456789 and DAHDI/g1/0123456789

Thanks for replying ! I've added a link here http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Channels+and+Groups to http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+ZAP+channels. 2008/12/1 Mark Michelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Olivier wrote: Hello, Groups in asterisk are summarized here

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between Asterisk and FreeSwitch

Please read: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/FreeSwitch and http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk Then if you have a specific question about one of them, come back here to ask about asterisk, and on the freeswitch mailinglist for more info on that technology. Or you could

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between Asterisk and FreeSwitch

On Tuesday 22 January 2008 11:50:25 love U.all wrote: what is the difference between FreeSwitch and Asterisk , The main difference in functionality is that FreeSwitch is a voip-switch only. It does not have any method to interface to the PSTN, other than through using another host which does

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between Asterisk and FreeSwitch

what is the difference between FreeSwitch and Asterisk , The main difference in functionality is that FreeSwitch is a voip-switch only. Technically, FreeSWITCH is a soft-switch, or a modular media switching library that can switch more than just voice. Also, technically, FS is a library,

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between TE121 and TE122

The TE121 is a PCI Express card (TE122 is standard PCI, 2.2 if I'm not mistaken). Gal Barak Tech support Atelis PLC 2008/1/16, Guilherme Loch Waltrick Góes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What's the difference between the TE121 and TE122. I read the description on Digium's site and it isn't clear to me.

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between TE121 and TE122

Hello! Guilherme Loch Waltrick Góes wrote: What's the difference between the TE121 and TE122. I read the description on Digium's site and it isn't clear to me. Best regards, The only one difference is interface: one of them have PCI and other have PCI-Express. -- Best regards, Igor A.

Re: [asterisk-users] difference between FXO interfaces !

The model AP200 that you are giving as example is 2 port only... and i'm not sure about the price... I know that codec conversion is one of the most cpu-intensive task that asterisk has to do, so, you can chose a Digium/Sangoma card with a powerful server doing the work or you can also use a VoIP

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between trunk and released versions

Yehavi, The release branches (1.2, 1.4) were at one time trunk. When it was decided to release 1.4, for example, it was branched off from trunk as the 1.4branch. New functionality continued to be added to trunk after that. Once the release branches are created, they are feature-frozen and only

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between trunk and released versions

Hello Sean, Does this clear things up? Yes! Thanks! __Yehavi: ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference in show channels

'show channels' shows only running calls while 'sip show channels' shows all running sip sessions including phones trying to register . On 09/09/2007, ram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all what is the difference between show channels sip show channles i see the difference in both show

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference in show channels

On 9/9/07, Jaswinder Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 'show channels' shows only running calls while 'sip show channels' shows all running sip sessions including phones trying to register . thanks but after my 30 channels of show channels i see lot of vice break and choppy voice doing

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between WaitExten and TIMEOUT (response)

Michiel van Baak wrote: On 05:27, Fri 03 Aug 07, bilal ghayyad wrote: Hi List; What is the difference between WaitExten function and TIMEOUT (response)? As I see that both are used to determine the allowed time to enter the digits, any one can advise? WaitExten is waiting for

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between WaitExten and TIMEOUT (response)

The difference is in the scope of the command. Think of it this way: WaitExten gives the user more time to enter digits before the dialplan moves on to the next instruction in the dial plan. Timeout is the max number of seconds to wait at any point in the current context before deciding the user

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between WaitExten and TIMEOUT (response)

Dear Michael; I understood it in that way (please advise me if I am correct): WaitExten is for the time to complete entering the digits, while timeout is specified wether user responded by dialing any thing or not. Please advise. regards The difference is in the scope of the command. Think of

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between WaitExten and TIMEOUT (response)

On 05:27, Fri 03 Aug 07, bilal ghayyad wrote: Hi List; What is the difference between WaitExten function and TIMEOUT (response)? As I see that both are used to determine the allowed time to enter the digits, any one can advise? WaitExten is waiting for you to type an extension. TIMEOUT is

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between WaitExten and TIMEOUT (response)

On 8/3/07, bilal ghayyad wrote: Hi List; What is the difference between WaitExten function and TIMEOUT (response)? As I see that both are used to determine the allowed time to enter the digits, any one can advise? core show function TIMEOUT for different timeout parameters, I haven't

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference between SCCP and Cisco Call Manager traffic?

Call setup/teardown is handled with the SIP protocol while the actual call audio is handled with RTP I think. Check the config of your NAT devices relative to RTP. scd On 4/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm wondering about the difference between Cisco Call Manager and

Re: [Asterisk-Users] difference betwen a TE411P and TE410P

Rodney G. McDuff wrote: Is the TE411P just a TE410P with hardware echo cancellation? Yes. Same for a TE405P and TE406P. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] difference between records in CDR and realduration of call

On 3/10/06, AR Tarzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's because the duration is counted from the time of dialling. billsec is what you want if it's to calculate the duration the call was active. To change what shows you need to change call-log.php in /var/www/html/admin/cdr/ Instead of

Re: [Asterisk-Users] difference between records in CDR and real duration of call

What about ResetCDR() just before Dial()? nik600 wrote: hi i've made some test calls, i've notice that a call of the duration of 1:29 minutes is recorded in the cdr database as 1:45 minutes, is it normal? i think that 15 seconds are too many... how can i correct this? thanks

Re: [Asterisk-Users] difference between records in CDR and real duration of call

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:04:18 +0100 nik600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi i've made some test calls, i've notice that a call of the duration of 1:29 minutes is recorded in the cdr database as 1:45 minutes, is it normal? i think that 15 seconds are too many... how can i correct this?

Re: [Asterisk-Users] difference between records in CDR and real duration of call

Or maybe, you should try the C flag in your Dial(). []'s MM nik600 wrote: hi i've made some test calls, i've notice that a call of the duration of 1:29 minutes is recorded in the cdr database as 1:45 minutes, is it normal? i think that 15 seconds are too many... how can i correct this?

Re: [Asterisk-Users] difference between records in CDR and real duration of call

ok, thanks for your reply, tomorrow i'll test and let you know bye ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] difference between records in CDR and realduration of call

That's because the duration is counted from the time of dialling. billsec is what you want if it's to calculate the duration the call was active. To change what shows you need to change call-log.php in /var/www/html/admin/cdr/ Instead of duration extract billsec - you can still label it

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:03:42AM -0500, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 07:04 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: OT: Not a Knoppix, actually. You can't do anything useful with it without a HD install. A while ago I needed badly to test

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tzafrir Cohen wrote: I should be releasing a much improved Live version of AstLinux within a week or so. A test version was announced on my mailing list a while ago, with pretty good results so far. It will be AstLinux 0.2.8, and available as an ISO (as well as the Windows install package,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 02:40:40AM -0500, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: I tried astlinux 0.2.6 as well, however as a live CD it wasn't useful, because I could not write any modified configuration on the live /etc . Thus I could not run asterisk with the modified configuration without a proper

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

My 2c worth... For the beginner, AAH is great. The PC that you install on will be totally reformatted / fdisk-ed (assuming single drive - etc). With AAH 1.3 - the installation goes to sleep and sort of finishes when its Syncing with a Time Server. A reboot at this point seems to do no harm. As

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

my $0.02... I have implemented [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.9 ina Real Estate/Legal office with 6 phones and 3 incoming lines using TDM04B card and Polycom/Sipura phones. I am about to implement 3 more systems ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.3) for a construction company.One will be 6 phones and 4 PSTN lines

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and Asterisk@home

That question could start a battle. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a bootable Asterisk system. Think of it as the Knoppix of the Linux distro world. It could work but that is for you to decide. On 7/17/05, Michael Felder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello What is the difference between these 2 version

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I guess I was wondering if it was crippled in some way. Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Latham Sent: Monday, 18 July 2005 1:18 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and Asterisk@home

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Latham Sent: Monday, 18 July 2005 1:18 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Felder Sent: Sunday, 17 July 2005 11:33 PM To: Andrew Latham; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess I was wondering if it was crippled in some way

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I think that AAH would suit you fine for a small business application. It is not crippled in any way. Far from it in fact. It has more features installed as default than the latest CVS version. It is however based on the latest official release of the Asterisk code (whatever that is at the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Michael Felder wrote: Hello What is the difference between these 2 version of Asterisk in terms of functionality. For a small office am I going to run into problems if I use the easy version... Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a Linux distribution that makes it easy to install Asterisk and a few

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mark Phillips wrote: I think that AAH would suit you fine for a small business application. It is not crippled in any way. Far from it in fact. It has more features installed as default than the latest CVS version. Not to sound rude, but that doesn't make any sense. Or I'm reading it wrong

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 10:18:26PM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: That question could start a battle. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a bootable Asterisk system. Think of it as the Knoppix of the Linux distro world. It could work but that is for you to decide. OT: Not a Knoppix, actually. You can't do

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 07:04 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 10:18:26PM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: That question could start a battle. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a bootable Asterisk system. Think of it as the Knoppix of the Linux distro world. It could work but that is for

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 07:04 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 10:18:26PM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: That question could start a battle. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a bootable Asterisk system. Think of it as the Knoppix of the Linux distro

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Asterisk and Asterisk@home?

Kib Eki wrote: Hi, can one summarize the main differences between Asterisk and [EMAIL PROTECTED] or point me to a location where i can find such a list? See [EMAIL PROTECTED] site - http://asteriskathome.sf.net - and asterisk site - www.asterisk.org. Basically, asterisk is a program, and [EMAIL

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference Between NAT=yes and QUALIFY=yes and STUN...

Matt wrote: I have a STUN server running on my Asterisk box which seems to work for most of my SIP clients.. but some of them seem to require NAT=yes turned on. If I go further and turn QUALIFY=yes to on, is there a reason I need to keep running a STUN server? If so, what's the difference? I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Snom 190 Elmeg 290?

Am Samstag 05 März 2005 07:58 schrieb Remco Barende: Hi list! While looking for the Snom 190 I found another phone, the Elmeg IP 290 (www.elmeg.de). Looking at the pictures the specs they seem to be very similar beasts but the firmware is supposedly not interchangeable. Does anyone know

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Snom 190 Elmeg 290?

On 5 Mar 2005, at 06:58, Remco Barende wrote: Hi list! While looking for the Snom 190 I found another phone, the Elmeg IP 290 (www.elmeg.de). Looking at the pictures the specs they seem to be very similar beasts but the firmware is supposedly not interchangeable. Does anyone know the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Snom 190 Elmeg 290?

Hello Remco, On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Remco Barende wrote: Hi list! While looking for the Snom 190 I found another phone, the Elmeg IP 290 (www.elmeg.de). Looking at the pictures the specs they seem to be very similar beasts but the firmware is supposedly not interchangeable. Does anyone

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Snom 190 Elmeg 290?

: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between Snom 190 Elmeg 290? Hello Remco, On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Remco Barende wrote: Hi list! While looking for the Snom 190 I found another phone, the Elmeg IP 290 (www.elmeg.de). Looking at the pictures the specs they seem to be very similar

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI

PRI comes in 2versions E1 European and T1 US E1 30 channels T1 23 channels On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 14:15, Eric Bishop wrote: Hi all, I have seen the term E1 and PRI used interchangably when referring to a voice service with 30B channels and 1 D channel. Are they just different terms for the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI

Eric Bishop wrote: Hi all, I have seen the term E1 and PRI used interchangably when referring to a voice service with 30B channels and 1 D channel. Are they just different terms for the same thing or is there some technical difference. Even Newton's telco dictonary seemed a bit fuzzy on this

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI

Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI Eric Bishop wrote: Hi all, I have seen the term E1 and PRI used interchangably when referring to a voice service with 30B channels and 1 D channel. Are they just different

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Eric Bishop wrote: I have seen the term E1 and PRI used interchangably when referring to a voice service with 30B channels and 1 D channel. Are they just different terms for the same thing or is there some technical difference. Even Newton's telco dictonary seemed a bit

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI

Eric, E1 is a physical layer protocol, like ethernet. It defines a 2Mbps pipe, which can be used for data, or can be split into 32 64Kbps telephone channels, or a mixture. If used for telephone channels, 30 of these channels can carry one telephone conversation each, and 2 carry signalling and

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI

Alistair- Good writeup! Question regarding Q.SIG: Can it be used to solve the problem of signaling a remote switch to take a call back and extend it to another channel instead? This, as you know, is always a challenge when using IVR in a call centre environment, when one wants to extend an

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Stingel Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 9:32 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI Alistair- Good writeup! Question regarding Q.SIG

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI

Scott, Yes, and this is one of the principal reasons people choose Q.SIG. I've worked on quite a few large voicemail servers, and these tend to do a lot of transfers for follow-me and operator features. Q.SIG support can significantly reduce the number of telephony channels needed, as not only

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Difference between E1 and PRI

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Scott Stingel wrote: Good writeup! Question regarding Q.SIG: Can it be used to solve the problem of signaling a remote switch to take a call back and extend it to another channel instead? This, as you know, is always a challenge when using IVR in a call centre

  1   2   >