Chris Abnett wrote:
> I originally felt similarly to you as I thought it would be a real pain to
> build from sources and install.. however I found it very easy to build up a
> development linux box and build from sources... thus also allowing me to
> select the features I want in my system. Build
Darrick Hartman wrote:
> John,
>
> There are no problems using CentOS. There may be some issues with
> autoconf on FC9. FC8 worked fine. A 32bit host system works better
> than a 64bit host (for the build environment).
>
> 2.5 kernel? Those were the beta ones before 2.6 came out! Dang
> t
I have actually done as you explained with the SCPing of the files..
however I wasn't sure if the user in question knew how to SCP or not.. but
I definitely Like this system ever since going to runnix SO MUCH better than
before.. I didn't realize I could leave the multiple versions in there..
that
John,
There are no problems using CentOS. There may be some issues with
autoconf on FC9. FC8 worked fine. A 32bit host system works better
than a 64bit host (for the build environment).
2.5 kernel? Those were the beta ones before 2.6 came out! Dang that's
old.
Everything is accurate with
WOW!!
This would really be a nice Wiki page or two.
I have never seen such a concise set of instructions posted anywhere.
I will wait a little to see what flak this creates, but I may well try it.
I prefer the CentOS flavor, but assume that there would be little if any
trouble using that instead
I originally felt similarly to you as I thought it would be a real pain to
build from sources and install.. however I found it very easy to build up a
development linux box and build from sources... thus also allowing me to
select the features I want in my system. Building a default system being
w
Not wanting to beat an almost dead horse, but, when it was available, I
copied the one and only version of 0.5 and installed it.
I am using the generic 586 version. 1682
Yes, I know that it is Asterisk 1.2, which many consider obsolete, but
for too many reasons to go into I want to continue with
Darren,
I'll post some comments inline, but do want to apologize for the long
delay between official releases.
Darren Grant wrote:
> I don't know what has happened to Astlinux.
>
> While I appreciate that Astlinux is a free Open Source offering I can't help
> but feel it has gone from something
I don't know what has happened to Astlinux.
While I appreciate that Astlinux is a free Open Source offering I can't help
but feel it has gone from something that was installable by the average
Linux user to something that only an expert can now install.
I don't have the understanding to checkout
