c Kid
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Asterisk traffic analysis
I have found hangup handlers to be MUCH more accurate than the h extension..
it seemed whe ni was using the h extension that it wouldnt trigger.. or
triggered in a different context than I expected when calls failed.
-Christ
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Asterisk traffic analysis
> Am 07.08.2017 um 05:45 schrieb Michael Knill
> :
>
> Thanks Christopher for the info.
>
> Regards
> Michael Knill
Hi Michael,
I often use the h-extension (or hangu
{HANGUPCAUSE})
Then you can react based on the HANGUPCAUSE.
> -Original Message-
> From: AstLinux List
> Reply-To: The Cadillac Kid , AstLinux List
>
> Date: Monday, 7 August 2017 at 1:26 pm
> To: AstLinux List
> Cc: The Cadillac Kid
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-user
Thanks Christopher for the info.
Regards
Michael Knill
-Original Message-
From: AstLinux List
Reply-To: The Cadillac Kid , AstLinux List
Date: Monday, 7 August 2017 at 1:26 pm
To: AstLinux List
Cc: The Cadillac Kid
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Asterisk traffic analysis
I do it
I do it within asterisk itself, I use custom cel events that get logged to
SQLite on the box, there's also an agi that gets run in the event I run out of
trunks. This notifies my noc, all failed trunk calls are logged specially, this
is extra important on my hosted sites as I should not fail tru
