rver-using-freenas-slimnas-and-an-h-p-t5700/
Given that HP moved to a different form factor for thin clients that
expansion kit may be harder to find now.
Michael Graves
mgraves mstvp.com
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:mjgra...@mstvp.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
> Ori
Actually, this is not true. Asterisk has been running on Blackfin a long
time, since 2006 when David Rowe was working on the IP04. The IP0x
series of embedded asterisk systems from ATCOM are Blackfin based.
http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/asterisk/
Michael Graves
mgraves mstvp.com
o(713
in the m9, but we're pretty happy with the Gigaset
C61H & S79H handsets.
Michael Graves
mgraves mstvp.com
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:mjgra...@mstvp.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
> Original Message
> Subject: [Astlinux-users] Snom M3/M9 experience?
> Fr
I'd expect SILK to outperform iLBC at similar bit rates.
Michael Graves
mgraves mstvp.com
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:mjgra...@mstvp.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
> Original Message
> Subject: [Astlinux-users] Mobile SIP clients, Bria vs. Groundwire
> From: L
Actually, according to Dan York I'm an "audio snob."
I'll take that. The implication is that I care about being heard clearly
and well understood ;-)
Michael Graves
mgraves mstvp.com
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:mjgra...@mstvp.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
> --
Additions inline.
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] The wireless
router dilemma
From: "Michael Knill"
Date: 10/6/14 5:22 pm
To: "AstLinux Users Mailing List"
Thanks Darrick
Pretty good reviews for the Ubiquity stuff. Not a real big saving over an ALIX
s
Of course, iptables is quite different from pf, which is the basis of both
pfsense and m0n0wall.
-Michael Graves
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] The wireless
router dilemma
From: "The Cadillac Kid"
Date: 10/6/14 5:57 pm
To: "AstLinux Users Mailing List"
All this talk of browser rendering inspired me to have a look in Lynx, the
original text mode browser. The links do appear there.
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] OK - I give
up
From: "John Novack_PIV2"
Date: 3/10/17 3:57 pm
To: "AstLinux Users Mailing List"
> Anyone know of a VoIP trunk vendor that will support HD voice codecs... and
> keep HD through its paths if the other end also supports HD?
In reality, what you're asking for is an ITSP that doesn't always proxy the
media. That allows the end-points to freely negotiate the codec in-use, wh
I suggest that your past experience was based upon wholly avoiding and kind of
digital anything. A wholly analog path placed no arbitrary constraints on the
performance.
Add any kind of traditional telecom digital device and you will not see that
same performance. The A/D process must bandwid
Josh,
Nope. It does not support dialing by SIP URI. You need to map the SIP URI to an
extension on your PBX.
Honestly, my impression is that they support Opus as an approach to low
bit-rate calling, like G.729 but without the licensing headache.
Michael Graves
mgra...@mstvp.com
http://www.
11 matches
Mail list logo
