On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 8:32 PM Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On 3/9/2024 9:58 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> >
> > Am 07.03.2024 um 17:49 schrieb Kalle Valo:
> >> Robert Marko writes:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 8:23 PM Jeff Johnson
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> Historically, prior to being
Per filesystems/sysfs.rst, show() should only use sysfs_emit()
or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the value to be returned to user space.
coccinelle complains that there are still a couple of functions that use
snprintf(). Convert them to sysfs_emit().
sprintf() will be converted as weel if they
On 13/03/2024 16:53, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 17:09, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> On 05/03/2024 20:20, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>>> Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>>
I need to build a kernel + rootfs + FW to test the proposed solution,
then I can spin a formal submission.
>>>
On 3/7/2024 8:46 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 3/7/2024 7:29 AM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>> Have you heard back from the dev team?
>>
>> Do they confirm that an issue involving missing MSA_READY notifications
>> was ever noticed?
>>
>> What devices were affected? (All msm8998? A subset of msm8998?)
>>
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 14:31, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
> On 13/03/2024 16:53, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 17:09, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/03/2024 20:20, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >>
> >>> Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> >>>
> I need to build a kernel + rootfs + FW to test
On 14/03/2024 15:33, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 3/7/2024 8:46 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 3/7/2024 7:29 AM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>>> Have you heard back from the dev team?
>>>
>>> Do they confirm that an issue involving missing MSA_READY notifications
>>> was ever noticed?
>>>
>>> What
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:56:34PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
>
> [
>This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
>the second week of the merge window of v6.9 and submit it then. Hoping
>to keep the conflicts that it will
On 3/14/2024 10:52 AM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> Is this the line you're after:
> [ 32.367011] ath10k_snoc 1880.wifi: qmi fw_version 0x100204b2
> fw_build_timestamp 2019-09-04 03:01 fw_build_id
> QC_IMAGE_VERSION_STRING=WLAN.HL.1.0-01202-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1.221523.2
perfect
> Is it legal for my
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:57:57 -0700
Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:56:34PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)"
> >
> > [
> >This is a treewide change. I will likely re-create this patch again in
> >the second week of the merge window of
Hi Jeff,
On 2024-03-13 15:32, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Kalle & I are just the conduit, but I've relayed this thread to the folks
responsible for feeding us the firmware releases.
Thank you for providing that service to the community. It's much
appreciated.
Is there a chance you could ask the
tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git
ath-qca
branch HEAD: 10526d294663057a53888aecb2d4d24e099da313 Merge branch 'ath-next'
into ath-qca
elapsed time: 722m
configs tested: 154
configs skipped: 4
The following configs have been built successfully.
More
tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git
master
branch HEAD: a2a4cf3541db8066af7e6d4eb6e9e6445f6d9658 Add
localversion-wireless-testing-ath
elapsed time: 721m
configs tested: 160
configs skipped: 3
The following configs have been built successfully.
More
tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git
ath-next
branch HEAD: f8c0799b2428a2599a540b0ba1e180a6e3460699 wifi: ath11k: advertise
P2P dev support for QCA6390/WCN6855/QCA2066
elapsed time: 721m
configs tested: 149
configs skipped: 3
The following configs have
Per filesystems/sysfs.rst, show() should only use sysfs_emit()
or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the value to be returned to user space.
coccinelle complains that there are still a couple of functions that use
snprintf(). Convert them to sysfs_emit().
sprintf() will be converted as weel if they
14 matches
Mail list logo
