On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
The fact remains that ath9k on Linux is not mature rock solid in all
different modes and bands, and that hasn't really changed over the
last year and a half I've been around, despite the endless hours that
have been spent on
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Xianghua Xiao xiaoxiang...@gmail.com wrote:
Almost all Atheros-based commercial products on the market are still
based on Atheros's SDK, its driver is still madwifi-based but worked
_reliably_. The IBSS/adhoc driver in that SDK is not fully
done(especially
On 2011-04-27 2:18 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Larry Vaden wrote:
I was refering exclusively to the ath9k code and community.
..
I look at ath9k, Felix, Adrian et al as real sw folks who have
forgotten more than I'll ever know wrt the specifics of the matter
at hand.
Yes Felix in
On 27 April 2011 15:52, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
I'm eager to test ath9k hardware with fbsd because Adrian indeed has
much more than a clue.
Sure, Adrian is good at what he does, but Atheros support in FreeBSD is
still quite a bit behind, because for a long time very little work
From: Sujith Manoharan sujith.manoha...@atheros.com
Bump the firmware version to 1.2
Signed-off-by: Sujith Manoharan sujith.manoha...@atheros.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hif_usb.h |2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 2
From: Sujith Manoharan sujith.manoha...@atheros.com
Signed-off-by: Sujith Manoharan sujith.manoha...@atheros.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c |2 --
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.h |1 -
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Sujith Manoharan sujith.manoha...@atheros.com
This patch adds WMI_BITRATE_MASK_CMDID which can be
used by the set_bitrate_mask() handler.
Signed-off-by: Sujith Manoharan sujith.manoha...@atheros.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h |7 +++
From: Sujith Manoharan sujith.manoha...@atheros.com
This callback is used to set the minimum rate for management
frames.
Signed-off-by: Sujith Manoharan sujith.manoha...@atheros.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_main.c | 50 +
1 files changed, 50
Thanks! This is the kind of feedback I was looking for. Comments below.
On Apr 26, 2011, at 7:30 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
Run node A in AP mode,
have nodes B,C and D connect to it.
Do lots of site scans use chans 1,6,11 as needed.
Don't use any encryption.
Use openvpn or
On Sunday 24 of April 2011 10:41:16 Sujith wrote:
Hello
(it stopped working completely recently in wireless-testing though:
ieee80211 phy0: device no longer idle - working
wlan0: direct probe to 68:7f:74:77:36:bc (try 1/3)
wlan0: direct probe to 68:7f:74:77:36:bc (try 2/3)
wlan0:
On 28 April 2011 01:03, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net wrote:
Regarding the other direction this thread has taken, I also thought that the
doom and gloom re: the status and future of ath9k was a bit overstated. It is
disappointing to not have more direct support from Atheros but at least
WDS is crap, don't use it. You effectively half the available
bandwidth per node in a WDS network, it's a hack and is only useful if
you want coverage at the sacrifice of bandwidth of the link.
On 28 April 2011 05:03, John Nielsen li...@jnielsen.net wrote:
Thanks! This is the kind of feedback I
I only know of one Venema in this world, Dr. Wietse Venema of postfix
fame and more than a handful of other frequently used gems.
How did this host get its name?
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
If I can make a suggestion, and you should take this as a hint about
the direction you (being people on this list) should take - get into
ath9k development. Show initiative and interest, get some work done,
and ask for
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling j...@aenertia.net wrote:
WDS is crap, don't use it. You effectively half the available
bandwidth per node in a WDS network, it's a hack and is only useful if
you want coverage at the sacrifice of bandwidth of the link.
There is one vendor in
On 28 April 2011 09:27, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
There is one vendor in the marketplace where if you want layer 2
transparency on a p-t-p link, you VILL use WDS :(
What's broken about WDS? Just that you halve bandwidth?
Adrian
___
On 28 April 2011 09:25, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
Is http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-bisect.html
more or less the best reference for learning about bisecting patches?
I think so. I'm not really up to date for doing Linux bisecting. :-)
Adrian
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 28 April 2011 09:27, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
There is one vendor in the marketplace where if you want layer 2
transparency on a p-t-p link, you VILL use WDS :(
What's broken about WDS? Just that you halve
On 2011-04-28 2:58 AM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
WDS is crap, don't use it. You effectively half the available
bandwidth per node in a WDS network, it's a hack and is only useful if
you want coverage at the sacrifice of bandwidth of the link.
WDS doesn't cut your bandwidth in half, repeating
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2011-04-28 2:58 AM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
WDS is crap, don't use it. You effectively half the available
bandwidth per node in a WDS network, it's a hack and is only useful if
you want coverage at the sacrifice of
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
gnu...@no-log.org wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 20:41 +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
gnu...@no-log.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 11:04 +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
please try
21 matches
Mail list logo