On 14 June 2011 21:20, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
> I had removed a check that looks redundant. this will be anyway called
> in radio_disable.
> if some one has time and has easy way of applying the patch like in
> compat wireless, can they see if it fixes by any chance(less
> probably).
> FYI I had
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:47:35 +0800
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I don't have any new thoughts, no. I think it's more likely something
> to do with how the bus is being setup, how APSM is being used, how
> power saving in general is handled, quirks of that chipset (all the
> laptops with problems have be
On Tuesday 14 June 2011 18:43:51 Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:31 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > On 06/14/2011 12:02 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > /* Get the message ID */
> > > - msg_id = (__be16 *) ((void *) htc_hdr +
> > > - s
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:31 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 12:02 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > /* Get the message ID */
> > - msg_id = (__be16 *) ((void *) htc_hdr +
> > -sizeof(struct htc_frame_hdr));
> > + msg_id = (void *)h
On 06/14/2011 12:02 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> /* Get the message ID */
> - msg_id = (__be16 *) ((void *) htc_hdr +
> - sizeof(struct htc_frame_hdr));
> + msg_id = (void *)htc_hdr + sizeof(struct htc_frame_hdr);
I would never do
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ok. Mohammed, APSM is broken in a different way on some laptops. maybe
> the state transition between sleep states is different somehow.
>
> Which model notebook is this Camilo? :)
>
>
> adrian
>
> On 11 June 2011 14:42, Camilo Mesias wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n.c
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n.c
>> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ int mwifiex_ret_11n_cfg(struct host_cmd_ds_command
>> *resp, void *data_buf)
>>struct host_cmd_ds_11n_cfg *htcfg = &resp->params.htcfg;
>>
>>if (data_buf) {
>> -
> - pt = (T *)pv;
> + pt = pv;
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches j...@perches.com
...
> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n.c |5 ++---
> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/cmdevt.c |3 +--
> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/join.c|2 +-
> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sca
On 14 June 2011 19:44, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
> I had verified with the internal code base whether this is being done,
> unfortunately no and at least I had tested this patch in my lenovo
> T400 machine it did not cause any issue. this might fix the issue for
> the specific platform but I am not s
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 07:10:56PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
>> > I see this commit in 2.6.39, missed in 2.6.38 and 2.6.35 currently.
>> > Is possible this is the fix which do not break other things?
>>
>> hi,
>> no, this fix only affe
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:20:17 -0500
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> >> Also, is there a kernel.org bugzilla report entry for this? I'll
> >> update it with the relevant information so the regression isn't
> >> forgotten about.
> >
> > Let's use https://
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 07:10:56PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
> > I see this commit in 2.6.39, missed in 2.6.38 and 2.6.35 currently.
> > Is possible this is the fix which do not break other things?
>
> hi,
> no, this fix only affects AR9280 and it does not affects AR9285.
That could be another
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:39 +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
> My issue here is that you mention in the commit log that this relates
> to the removal of netdev_priv and dev_priv, but the casts removed
> (mostly) don't.
Sorry if that was unclear to you.
None of these patches remove casts of netdev_priv
13 matches
Mail list logo
