Re: [ath9k-devel] What is the expected throughput of ath9k with 20Mhz channel bandwidth?

2016-06-30 Thread sandeep suresh
Dear experts,Has anyone has the throughput numbers for AR9287? On a 802.11g (20MHz), I could measure < 20Mbps with iPerf.And are the below measurements done in an anechoic chamber free from other WiFi traffic and only 2 clients (source and sink for iPef) connected to a WiFi AP?Regards Sandeep.

Re: [ath9k-devel] What is the expected throughput of ath9k with 20Mhz channel bandwidth?

2016-06-30 Thread Le Tran Dat
I did TCP test within RF boxes. The results seems right to me because my AR9342 is 2 streams and I can get 65-70. With your 9580, If I am not wrong, is 3 streams, you can get up to 95. However, I am going to test 9558 to see how much it can go. I expected 2 streams 20Mhz to get around 90Mbps. Th

[ath9k-devel] ath9k: EEPROM format / byte swapping

2016-06-30 Thread Martin Blumenstingl
Hello, I have a question regarding the ath9k EEPROM format. Most EEPROM versions have two magic bytes at the beginning, indicating the endianness of the data in this EEPROM. Let's take the AR9287 EEPROM as an example: during ath9k initialization ath9k/eeprom_9287.c:ath9k_hw_ar9287_check_eeprom is

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: Fix programming of minCCA power threshold

2016-06-30 Thread Kalle Valo
Sven Eckelmann wrote: > The function ar9003_hw_apply_minccapwr_thresh takes as second parameter not > a pointer to the channel but a boolean value describing whether the channel > is 2.4GHz or not. This broke (according to the origin commit) the ETSI > regulatory compliance on 5GHz channels. > >

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: return false when reading wrong eeprom offset

2016-06-30 Thread Kalle Valo
Eduardo Abinader wrote: > Just setting the proper return for reading beyond the eeprom data. > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Abinader > Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby Thanks, 1 patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git: 0f27ac40fb64 ath9k: return false when reading wrong eeprom offset -- Sent by p