Re: [ath9k-devel] Is two different AP's RTS/CTS affect each other's sta?

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 7:21 AM, 杰尔米 wrote: > There are two APs: (R1, R2) > And there are four STAs:(S11, S12, S21, S22) > S11 and S12 are in the network of R1, > S21 and S22 are in the network of R2, > > i know that if S11 send a RTS packet, then S12 will wait a period. > but

Re: [ath9k-devel] queue priority mapping

Hi Thomas, 2014-11-30 14:30 GMT+03:00 Thomas Hühn tho...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de: From my point of view the call-path of the functions look like this: ath9k_init_queues(struct ath_softc *sc) - ath_txq_setup(sc, ATH9K_TX_QUEUE_DATA, i) with subtype-remapping via qi.tqi_subtype =

Re: [ath9k-devel] queue priority mapping

not know what to test. Greetings from Berlin Thomas Am 30.11.2014 um 19:18 schrieb Sergey Ryazanov ryazanov@gmail.com: Hi Thomas, 2014-11-30 14:30 GMT+03:00 Thomas Hühn tho...@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de: From my point of view the call-path of the functions look like this: ath9k_init_queues

Re: [ath9k-devel] Support for Ubnt UniFi Outdoor Plus

? And BTW do you try to tune to different channels? Rx don't work at each of them? I still cannot understand how this external filter determines tuning frequency. On 10/18/2014 12:48 AM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: Hi Yury, 2014-10-17 15:59 GMT+04:00 Shvedov Yury yshve...@arccn.ru: Hm... sounds

Re: [ath9k-devel] Support for Ubnt UniFi Outdoor Plus

Hi Yury, 2014-10-17 15:59 GMT+04:00 Shvedov Yury yshve...@arccn.ru: Hm... sounds good, but not very useful :) Do you know exactly or approximately what source I need to modify? If you want to know exactly how to control RF filter then try to ask ubnt guys :) You can check and even

Re: [ath9k-devel] I cannot disable RTS/CTS on ath9k.

2014-09-04 22:59 GMT+04:00 Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com: My setup is thus: ath9k station ath10k AP (RTS not enabled) ath9k monitor (on separate machine) I tried enabling (value 1024) and and also disabling RTS on the station. The station was forced to reconnect after setting the RTS

Re: [ath9k-devel] Physical carrier sensing (CCA)

2014-06-12 15:44 GMT+04:00 Gaurav Kumar Chauhan ck.gau...@globaledgesoft.com: On Tuesday 10 June 2014 02:18 PM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: 2014-06-05 12:57 GMT+04:00 Gaurav Kumar Chauhan ck.gau...@globaledgesoft.com: I am working on measuring channel load which requires knowledge of carrier

Re: [ath9k-devel] Physical carrier sensing (CCA)

Hi, 2014-06-05 12:57 GMT+04:00 Gaurav Kumar Chauhan ck.gau...@globaledgesoft.com: I am working on measuring channel load which requires knowledge of carrier sensing. I am comfortable with virtual carrier sensing but not with physical carrier sensing. I tried to google it but didn't get more

Re: [ath9k-devel] Disabling MAC sequence control

Hello, 2014-05-31 5:44 GMT+04:00 mahaveer gupta mgupta1...@gmail.com: Hello, We need to disable increments of mac layer sequence control field in the MAC header for some diagnostic purposes. Please let me know if there is some register settings that can be done to achieve the same in ath9k

Re: [ath9k-devel] Hardware Timestamp Question

Hi Diego, 2014-02-18 18:45 GMT+04:00 Diego Bernardes di3go.bernar...@gmail.com: The question is, how accurated this timestamp is? The precision is in nanoseconds, but what accuracy i can expect? The source of time information for timestamps is TSF timer which is 64-bit timer with microsecond

Re: [ath9k-devel] Infrastructure mode support for 5/10 Mhz channels

2013/12/7 Muhammad Ruwaifa Anwar ruwaifa.an...@gmail.com: Sergey Ryazanov ryazanov.s.a at gmail.com writes: Few years ago, we tested 5/10MHz channels in infrastructure mode (AP + several STA) with cards based on AR9280 chip. We used OpenWRT firmware on both sides of link. All stations were

Re: [ath9k-devel] Infrastructure mode support for 5/10 Mhz channels

2013/11/29 Kamran Nishat kamran.nis...@gmail.com: Hi, Hi Does anyone ever use used 5/10Mhz channel in infrastructure (AP/client) mode. If yes then can you tell me ur Atheros cards versions and rate control you used. Few years ago, we tested 5/10MHz channels in infrastructure mode (AP +

Re: [ath9k-devel] Infrastructure mode support for 5/10 Mhz channels

2013/11/29 Kamran Nishat kamran.nis...@gmail.com: 37Mbps whao which Rate Control did u use I fixed MCS 4 and I got only 4Mbps at max. We use minstrel_ht rate control algo as is, without any modifications. -- BR, Sergey ___ ath9k-devel mailing list

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: set 5/10 MHz supported channels

, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Sergey Ryazanov ryazanov@gmail.com wrote: Hi, 2013/11/8 Kamran Nishat kamran.nis...@gmail.com: Hi, I want to set 5 and 10 MHz channels. My AP has Atheros AR9160 and my nodes have AR5416. Are they supported for my cards. Can I go to higher MCS like 12-13

Re: [ath9k-devel] sensitivity control for ath9k with mac80211

2013/7/19 Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com: On 07/19/2013 06:36 AM, Flavio Leonel wrote: Ok i know that but the command iw not permited set sensitivity limit how i can seting this limit on atth9k , this question.. I tried messing with this some months ago and got nowhere. I could not

Re: [ath9k-devel] sensitivity control for ath9k with mac80211

2013/7/19 Flavio Leonel frleo...@gmail.com: Please'm fairly layman in chips and eeprom clarify CCA ANI.? CCA is 802.11 standard abbreviation of clear channel assessment. Simplistically, CCA threshold is the signal level above which receiver assumes that the channel is busy. Mainly affects the

Re: [ath9k-devel] Change frequency feature

Hello Roman, 2013/3/4 Tokarenko Roman toker...@yandex.ru: Also I have communication module RouberBoard R52N-m with chip atheros9220. I would like to know if there are some approaches to change working frequency for this chip. I ask it here, because I suppose that this feature is made