Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Almost all chips are using the same values in the initvals - the
> exceptions seem to be the ones that have had ETSI compliance fix
> attempts already. I'm pretty sure the new values (if adjusted for
> different bands) would be fully compatible.
For most of the chips, adjust
On 2014-02-17 03:27, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better to do this for all AR93xx chipsets in
>> ar9003_hw_apply_minccapwr_thresh instead of initvals?
>> I'm pretty sure this patch will leave most other devices non-compliant.
>
> The threshold values are adjust
Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to do this for all AR93xx chipsets in
> ar9003_hw_apply_minccapwr_thresh instead of initvals?
> I'm pretty sure this patch will leave most other devices non-compliant.
The threshold values are adjusted for each chip and are not the same
for all chips in
On 2014-02-14 03:45, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> From: Sujith Manoharan
>
> The minimum CCA power threshold values have to be adjusted
> for existing cards to be in compliance with new regulations.
> Newer cards will make use of the values obtained from EEPROM,
> support for this was added earlier.
From: Sujith Manoharan
The minimum CCA power threshold values have to be adjusted
for existing cards to be in compliance with new regulations.
Newer cards will make use of the values obtained from EEPROM,
support for this was added earlier. To make sure that cards
that are already in use and don'
