On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:27:01AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> Seems I saw a note a long time ago about virtual wiphy being
> removed sometime soon. Should we go ahead and remove it?
>
> It doesn't seem useful to me (virtual interfaces appear to
> work much better), and it would likely simplify th
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:27 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> Seems I saw a note a long time ago about virtual wiphy being
> removed sometime soon. Should we go ahead and remove it?
>
> It doesn't seem useful to me (virtual interfaces appear to
> work much better), and it would likely simplify the code
Seems I saw a note a long time ago about virtual wiphy being
removed sometime soon. Should we go ahead and remove it?
It doesn't seem useful to me (virtual interfaces appear to
work much better), and it would likely simplify the code
a bit to have it gone.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear
Candela Te
