Alex Hacker wrote:
Thank you Sujith. Probably I understood the following patch in a wrong way.
Felix removed all chain masks checking. If the mask 5 is invalid, how about
the mask 4 and 6?
The patch is correct. For calibration, the mask that is calibrated in
the EEPROM has to be used. Even if
2013/11/13 Pavel Roskin pro...@gnu.org:
Hello!
This might be of interest for developers working on ath5k and ath9k
drivers. It may be useful to have working MadWifi code for reference
to see how MadWifi accesses hardware registers, what packets it would
send, how it would communicate with
2013/11/14 Nick Kossifidis mickfl...@gmail.com:
I think since you want to go that way, it would be nice to switch the
binary HAL with the one from FreeBSD or Atheros's LegacyHAL, it should
be easy to do so (API should still be the same) and it'll be much
easier to compare ath5k/ath9k to
marcus muffin ath9kmuffin at gmail.com writes:
Hi Muhammad,
Thanks for your reply. I think there could be 2 solutions.
1. Using multi radio in ap (one channel for receive and other channel for
sending)
2. What do you think if I only disable the datalink retry (but
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:36:29 +
Nick Kossifidis mickfl...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/14 Nick Kossifidis mickfl...@gmail.com:
I think since you want to go that way, it would be nice to switch
the binary HAL with the one from FreeBSD or Atheros's LegacyHAL, it
should be easy to do so (API
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:06:04 +0100
Michael Renzmann mrenzm...@madwifi-project.org wrote:
Hi Pavel (and all),
the webserver including the svn repos is back online. Sorry for the
delay, but I don't check the various mailing lists on a regular
basis. Threfore it's better to send
I will try it next week. Let me share the the result later on
2013/11/15 Muhammad Ruwaifa Anwar ruwaifa.an...@gmail.com
marcus muffin ath9kmuffin at gmail.com writes:
Hi Muhammad,
Thanks for your reply. I think there could be 2 solutions.
1. Using multi radio in ap
