On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 15:39 +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
My issue here is that you mention in the commit log that this relates
to the removal of netdev_priv and dev_priv, but the casts removed
(mostly) don't.
Sorry if that was unclear to you.
None of these patches remove casts of netdev_priv.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 07:10:56PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
I see this commit in 2.6.39, missed in 2.6.38 and 2.6.35 currently.
Is possible this is the fix which do not break other things?
hi,
no, this fix only affects AR9280 and it does not affects AR9285.
That could be another
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:20:17 -0500
Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Also, is there a kernel.org bugzilla report entry for this? I'll
update it with the relevant information so the regression isn't
forgotten about.
Let's use
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 07:10:56PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
I see this commit in 2.6.39, missed in 2.6.38 and 2.6.35 currently.
Is possible this is the fix which do not break other things?
hi,
no, this fix
- pt = (T *)pv;
+ pt = pv;
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches j...@perches.com
...
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n.c |5 ++---
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/cmdevt.c |3 +--
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/join.c|2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/11n.c
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ int mwifiex_ret_11n_cfg(struct host_cmd_ds_command
*resp, void *data_buf)
struct host_cmd_ds_11n_cfg *htcfg = resp-params.htcfg;
if (data_buf) {
- tx_cfg =
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
ok. Mohammed, APSM is broken in a different way on some laptops. maybe
the state transition between sleep states is different somehow.
Which model notebook is this Camilo? :)
adrian
On 11 June 2011 14:42, Camilo
On 06/14/2011 12:02 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
/* Get the message ID */
- msg_id = (__be16 *) ((void *) htc_hdr +
- sizeof(struct htc_frame_hdr));
+ msg_id = (void *)htc_hdr + sizeof(struct htc_frame_hdr);
I would never do
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:31 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
On 06/14/2011 12:02 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
/* Get the message ID */
- msg_id = (__be16 *) ((void *) htc_hdr +
-sizeof(struct htc_frame_hdr));
+ msg_id = (void *)htc_hdr +
On Tuesday 14 June 2011 18:43:51 Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 12:31 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
On 06/14/2011 12:02 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
/* Get the message ID */
- msg_id = (__be16 *) ((void *) htc_hdr +
-
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:47:35 +0800
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I don't have any new thoughts, no. I think it's more likely something
to do with how the bus is being setup, how APSM is being used, how
power saving in general is handled, quirks of that chipset (all the
laptops with
On 14 June 2011 21:20, Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
I had removed a check that looks redundant. this will be anyway called
in radio_disable.
if some one has time and has easy way of applying the patch like in
compat wireless, can they see if it fixes by any chance(less
12 matches
Mail list logo
