Hi again,
I would heavily appreciate any response to my query regarding ath9k
-rate-control.
Many thanks
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Fred Matthews fre...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone advise on what rate control mechanism ath9k-rate-control is
based on, as for example Atheros
, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Fred Matthews fre...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi again,
I would heavily appreciate any response to my query regarding ath9k
-rate-control.
a basic outline, is a packet is tried at some rate(highest rate) and
the hw reports Tx Ack status and based on this PER(Packet Error
Hi all,
Can anyone advise on what rate control mechanism ath9k-rate-control is
based on, as for example Atheros chipsets use Onoe, and Minstrel
Rate Adaptation, from what I know is based on SampleRate.
Also is there any documentation on the ath9k-rate-control algorithm,
and/or can someone give a
Hi all,
Please may someone kindly reply to my query regarding STBC (below),
Thanks!
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Fred Matthews fre...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I am using STBC (Space Time Block Coding) 1 stream NICs like the AR9280.I
would be very grateful someone can kindly advise
Hi,
Thanks for replying Adrian,
OK, just for clarity, you are saying for 1-stream STBC NICs
(AR9380/9280), when I enable STBC from hostapd, the driver only
transmits in STBC (transmits multiple copies of data to each antenna)
if it sending at MCSs 0-7 (1 stream rates), due to low signal quality
Hi all,
I need to change parameters in, /drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c, such
that I can modify them at runtime via debugfs. I tried to do this but the
driver does not load, as I reckon init.c is called before debug.c
Is there anyway to do this as there is some functions I want to
Hi,
I am using STBC (Space Time Block Coding) 1 stream NICs like the AR9280.I would
be very grateful someone can kindly advise on how exactly STBC(transmits
multiple copies of a data across each of the antennas) works in ath9k.
I ask this because when I enable STBC 1-stream, the driver seems to
a patch
to do this correctly.
Thanks in advance
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mohammed Shafi wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Fred Matthews wrote:
Hi,
I used that command to disable the third antenna, and applied it to both AP
and STA AR9380 NICs.
I then performed an IPerf test
: shafi.wirel...@gmail.com
To: fre...@hotmail.co.uk
CC: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org;
ath9k-de...@venema.h4ckr.net; ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org;
susin...@qca.qualcomm.com
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Fred Matthews fre...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi all,
I am
; adrian.ch...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Fred Matthews fre...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I used that command to disable the third antenna, and applied it to both AP
and STA AR9380 NICs.
I then performed an IPerf test between both and then captured the statistics
from
Hi all,
I am installing the AR9380 NIC on laptops, but some only have two UFL
connectors, and thus I was wondering if using only two of the UFL antenna ports
will have any negative effect or difference than installing a 2x2 NIC (AR9280
for example which has only 2 ports anyway). Please kindly
Hi,
I would appreciate if anyone can help me with my previous query as soon as
possible.
Thanks!
From: fre...@hotmail.co.uk
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org;
ath9k-de...@venema.h4ckr.net; ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k
Subject: Patching ath9k/mac80211 to change MAC
Hi,I am looking to upgrade my current nodes and AP from the AR9280 2x2 MIMO NIC
to the AR9380 3x3 NIC.
Thus I was wondering if someone can kindly comment on the current chipset
stability with ath9k, also the current supported features (e.g. iw list
output) such as setting the NIC as an
13 matches
Mail list logo
