Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: good, but can I get to the next level?

2011-10-24 Thread Manuel Sáez
The other problem I'm seeing is that when I have a lot of clients connected - say, 20 or so - performance degrades pretty steeply and I start seeing high packet loss.  I know that sounds like a pure load issue, but I'd like to make sure it's only that and not some efficiency setting I can

[ath9k-devel] ath9k: good, but can I get to the next level?

2011-10-19 Thread Bryan Phillippe
Hi All, After upgrading to compat-wireless-2011-10-10 and hostapd-0.7.3 on my IXP4xx-based ARM Access Point, I'm seeing dramatically-improved stability and performance. Great work! Under these combinations of software, I'm seeing long-term AP associations maintained by the clients (no longer

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: good, but can I get to the next level?

2011-10-19 Thread Peter Stuge
Bryan Phillippe wrote: I've noted two issues that I'd like to explore with your help. I'm sorry to say, but you will get no help to explore these issues. You will have to become an expert and fix the issues yourself, before someone will discuss the problem in detail. By then the problems have

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: good, but can I get to the next level?

2011-10-19 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 20 October 2011 05:35, Bryan Phillippe b...@terran.org wrote: Hi All, After upgrading to compat-wireless-2011-10-10 and hostapd-0.7.3 on my IXP4xx-based ARM Access Point, I'm seeing dramatically-improved stability and performance.  Great work! Under these combinations of software, I'm