[ath9k-devel] power save mode in ath9k driver

2008-12-02 Thread Mark Ryden
Hello, I am performing some tests with various wireless nics and an access point. I have a question about the driver: As far as I know, this driver does support power save mode. When the device enters power saving mode, it should send a control frame (beacon) with power management bit set to 1,

Re: [ath9k-devel] [stable] [PATCH 0/3] ath9k: several fixes ported to 2.6.27

2008-12-02 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:51:19PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: This fixes a few issues seen on MacBook Pros: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11811 I've ported them to 2.6.27 to help with them being applied

[ath9k-devel] Rx filter Baseband

2008-12-02 Thread advan_xiang
hi,all I would like to switch RX filter bandwidth 20M(default) to 5/10MHz in Atheros AR5413 chipset, I fixed baseband 0x9944 register , but I'm not sure whether is right , someone helps me or gives me a clue ? thank you in advance . advan advan_xiang 2008-12-03

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] ath9k: Use GFP_ATOMIC when allocating TX private area

2008-12-02 Thread Sujith
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: @@ -1813,10 +1815,30 @@ int ath_tx_start(struct ath_softc *sc, struct sk_buff *skb, r = ath_tx_setup_buffer(sc, bf, skb, txctl); if (r) { - spin_lock_bh(sc-sc_txbuflock); + struct ath_txq *txq = NULL; + int qnum;

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] ath9k: Use GFP_ATOMIC when allocating TX private area

2008-12-02 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Sujith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: @@ -1813,10 +1815,30 @@ int ath_tx_start(struct ath_softc *sc, struct sk_buff *skb, r = ath_tx_setup_buffer(sc, bf, skb, txctl); if (r) { - spin_lock_bh(sc-sc_txbuflock); +

[ath9k-devel] patch ath9k-fix-sw-iommu-bounce-buffer-starvation.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree

2008-12-02 Thread gregkh
This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled Subject: ath9k: Fix SW-IOMMU bounce buffer starvation to the 2.6.27-stable tree. Its filename is ath9k-fix-sw-iommu-bounce-buffer-starvation.patch A git repo of this tree can be found at

Re: [ath9k-devel] [stable] [PATCH 1/3] ath9k: Handle -ENOMEM on RX gracefully

2008-12-02 Thread Greg KH
I don't see this patch upstream in Linus's tree. Am I just missing it and if so, do you know the git commit id? thanks, greg k-h On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:51:22PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: We would get an oops on RX on -ENOMEM by passing NULL to the hardware on ath_rx_buf_link(). The

[ath9k-devel] patch ath9k-correct-expected-max-rx-buffer-size.patch added to 2.6.27-stable tree

2008-12-02 Thread gregkh
This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled Subject: ath9k: correct expected max RX buffer size to the 2.6.27-stable tree. Its filename is ath9k-correct-expected-max-rx-buffer-size.patch A git repo of this tree can be found at