Hi,
man iwconfig tells, Link quality... depends totally on the driver and
hardware. I would like to know how to interpret the value for WPEA-127N driven
by ath9k - ideally to have a base value for estimation of useable bandwidth
(i.e. how much data could be sent and received per time).
Is
Have you made any progress in disabling the back off / carrier sense? Because I
have a similar project and I would really need some information. Did you made
the modifications in the mac.c file?
Thank you!
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
In the old days, I heard that multiple station VIFs could not work with
hardware encryption. Does anyone know if this is still true?
And if so, is this a hardware/firmware issue, or is it some limitation
that can be fixed in the driver?
I'd like to try offloading at least some of the encryption
.. maybe for later chips and proxysta support?
The problem is making sure that you can do both transmit and receive
MAC addresses when doing encryption and decryption.
Encryption is easier - we get to set which key explicitly. but on
reception it needs to look at both..
Adrian
On 3 April
On 04/03/2013 12:39 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
.. maybe for later chips and proxysta support?
The problem is making sure that you can do both transmit and receive
MAC addresses when doing encryption and decryption.
Encryption is easier - we get to set which key explicitly. but on
reception it
Hi,
I got
[ 646.367797] ath9k_htc 1-5:1.0: ath9k_htc: FW Version: 1.4
[ 646.367807] ath9k_htc 1-5:1.0: ath9k_htc: Please upgrade to FW version 1.3
on a 3.8.5 kernel installed from:
Hi,
The stable branch is 1.3. there's 1.3.1 release binaries and a 1.3 branch.
The 1.4 stuff is for development. I believe someone is working on the
right ath9k_htc check.
I'd like ath9k_htc to check that the version is at least 1.3.
Ie, my intention is from now on that = 1.3 API won't change
On 3 April 2013 14:16, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
Well, I can verify that it doesn't work in 3.9-rc5+ with AR9380
hardware
I think I'll focus elsewhere for a while..but if someone wants to make
this work somehow I'll send them some shiny present :)
Even something
On 04/03/2013 02:36 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 3 April 2013 14:16, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
Well, I can verify that it doesn't work in 3.9-rc5+ with AR9380
hardware
I think I'll focus elsewhere for a while..but if someone wants to make
this work somehow I'll send them
