Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-01.txt

2005-07-21 Thread Thomas Broyer
Antone Roundy wrote: On Wednesday, July 20, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote: I was actually wondering why non-stateful feeds couldn't have archives: in the This month's Top 10 records feed, why couldn't I link to Last month's Top 10 records? If this kind of links are not dealt

Re: Notes on the latest draft.

2005-07-21 Thread Graham
On 21 Jul 2005, at 4:43 am, James Cerra wrote: In an XSLT-based Atom-to-XHTML processor, that is a large cost when HTML includes many many many entities. At least, I think so and have ignored the problem because I can't think of a good way to solve it. Yes, but your proposed solution

Re: Notes on the latest draft.

2005-07-21 Thread Graham
On 21 Jul 2005, at 7:29 pm, James Cerra wrote: Graham, Yes, but your proposed solution just requires people at the other end of the chain to do the hard work. A common theme in the design of Atom is minimizing the amount of work that must be done by publishers (of which there are many) vs

Re: Notes on the latest draft.

2005-07-21 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* James Cerra [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 20:45]: Aren't HTML's character references harder for publishing software to produce compared with HTML numeric references? […] The only feed producer software that probably likes HTML character references above all else are human hands. And if

Latest on the comments extension

2005-07-21 Thread James M Snell
I've been continuing to tweak the comments extension and believe that I am nearing a stable enough version to draft up the I-D. Here's what I've got currently: http://www.snellspace.com/wp/?p=194 There are three link relations: * http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0/comments *

Re: Latest on the comments extension

2005-07-21 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 23:15]: Feedback requested. I like it so far; comments follow (no pun intended). /root provides the URL (dereferencable) to the Atom feed that contains the original entries and may appear within atom:feed and/or atom:entry Why is this

Re: Latest on the comments extension

2005-07-21 Thread James M Snell
A. Pagaltzis wrote: * James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 23:15]: Feedback requested. I like it so far; comments follow (no pun intended). ;-) /root provides the URL (dereferencable) to the Atom feed that contains the original entries and may appear within atom:feed

Re: Latest on the comments extension

2005-07-21 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-22 01:25]: For instance, if I linked to anything but an Atom feed, what would in-reply-to link to? Still atom:id values. Presumably, any resource linked to is associated, by whatever means, to the Atom feed containing the entry being replied to. I don’t