On 22 Dec 2005, at 21:34, James M Snell wrote:
In that case, the only viable solution is an extension element.
Yep. I have added James Holderness's solution and clarified the
points in N3.
This is similar to the Thread Extension use case in which replies
may appear within the same feed
Hmmm.. interesting thought, hadn't considered that.
rel="self" should always point to *this* document, and never to some
other document, but if the document referenced is the same document just
in a different language, then it is possible? Good thinking but I'm not
sure if it's legal accordi
In that case, the only viable solution is an extension element. This is
similar to the Thread Extension use case in which replies may appear
within the same feed as the original.
Here's how I would do it:
1. Introduce a new element.
2. Use rel="alternate", hreflang="{otherlanguage
* James Holderness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-22 21:00]:
> I would have thought @rel='alternate' (an alternate version of
> the resource described by the containing element) slightly more
> appropriate than @rel='self' (a resource equivalent to the
> containing element). There's also the restric
Henry Story wrote:
I still think it would be good to be able to have to entries in one feed
and be able to state that they are translations of one another. I don't
think that putting them in different feeds is going to cover all the
cases. See below.
Fair enough. Simon certainly seemed to
Yes. That is one solution. But what we are looking for is how one can
state that two entries in the same feed are translations of one another.
Henry
On 22 Dec 2005, at 20:52, James M Snell wrote:
Hmmm.. interesting thought, hadn't considered that.
rel="self" should always point to *this*
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-22 19:30]:
To indicate that the feeds were translations of one another, a
new "translation" link rel could be established on the feed
level
Is that even necessary? Wouldn’t @rel='self' already work here?
I would have thought
I still think it would be good to be able to have to entries in one
feed and be able to state that they are translations of one another.
I don't think that putting them in different feeds is going to cover
all the cases. See below.
On 22 Dec 2005, at 17:45, James M Snell wrote:
One possib
Simon makes some good practical points in the message I forwarded
just previous to this one. But I would like to make some more
abstract points too for those of you who are more of the Jungian
introspective/rational character types (most of us here I guess or
else we would be out surfing
Simon is not a member of the atom-syntax list. I imagine his response
will get through atom syntax moderation at some point, though as we
are in holiday season, I imagine this could take some time.
I have also changed the policy on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to allow
posts by non members, forcing
* James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-22 19:30]:
> To indicate that the feeds were translations of one another, a
> new "translation" link rel could be established on the feed
> level
>
>
> ...
>hreflang="fr"
> href="http://.../thefeed?lang=fr";
>
> tag:examp
FYI...
Original Message
Subject: Re: todo: add language encoding information
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:03:25 +0100
From: Henry Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi James, you forgot to send this to the Atom syntax l
Henry Story wrote:
Does Atom allow there to be multiple parallel renditions of a blog entry
in different languages?
So it is not really possible to put atom entries with the same id and
updated time stamp in a feed (without a SHOULD level violation) even if
they are translation of each ot
Sorry again to take so long to respond. I have been a little too busy
to respond recently.
On 4 Dec 2005, at 16:42, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Dec 4, 2005, at 14:33, Henry Story wrote:
I have written my first blog entry in French [1] which has made me
aware that
it would be very useful to add
14 matches
Mail list logo
