All,
Some sites offer two versions of feeds; one is a 'headline only'
version and the other a 'full' version. Other than the content, a
significant distinction in some cases is the license applied to the
data in each feed. (See http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Syndication.)
For example, the
I've been talking to a number of people face-to-face about Feed
History and the use cases for it, and I've come to a position where I
believe there are two major use cases out there for putting together
multiple feeds to form one big, virtual feed.
1) So-called incremental feeds, where
Mark Nottingham wrote:
I've been talking to a number of people face-to-face about Feed
History and the use cases for it, and I've come to a position where I
believe there are two major use cases out there for putting together
multiple feeds to form one big, virtual feed.
1) So-called
Hey John,
This is obviously an important question that also relates to the
GlobalClip/Citation work that I Bruce D'Arcus (Cc'd) and myself are
working on to allow the ability to extract all of the relative
meta-data, including licensing information, as part of a copy/paste
operation [web page
Hi David --
Not sure whether you're referring to feed licensing in general, or to
the problem of feeds with differing licenses and their relationships.
Can you clarify?
In either case, I think that requiring RDF in order to license a piece
of content would inhibit uptake. I think that's
