I'm assuming that since there was no additional expressed interest in
moving forward with the Atom autodiscovery draft that it's not going to
go anywhere. My current intention is to go ahead and let it expire
again without any further modifications.
- James
The autodisco draft originally authored by Mark Pilgrim and resurrected
by me late last year.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-autodiscovery-00.txt
- James
Jan Algermissen wrote:
James,
what draft do you refer to?
Thanks,
Jan
On 19.03.2007, at 20:50, James M
James,
what draft do you refer to?
Thanks,
Jan
On 19.03.2007, at 20:50, James M Snell wrote:
I'm assuming that since there was no additional expressed interest in
moving forward with the Atom autodiscovery draft that it's not
going to
go anywhere. My current intention is to go ahead
There were strong suggestions at the time, I think, that this was part
of HTML and should belong to the WHAT-WG.
So is there a WHAT-WG document to look at?
Also, is there a standard way to discover the collection associated with
a feed? (Given that, if there is an IETF or WHAT-WG way to
John Panzer wrote:
[snip]
Also, is there a standard way to discover the collection associated with
a feed? (Given that, if there is an IETF or WHAT-WG way to discover
feeds, there's an obvious way to discover collections... but I'm not
clear on what that would be. I do think that
On 20/3/07 9:00 AM, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, is there a standard way to discover the collection associated with a
feed? (Given that, if there is an IETF or WHAT-WG way to discover feeds,
there's an obvious way to discover collections... but I'm not clear on what
that would
