Re: Autodiscovery Draft

2007-03-25 Thread Elliotte Harold
John Panzer wrote: There were strong suggestions at the time, I think, that this was part of HTML and should belong to the WHAT-WG. So is there a WHAT-WG document to look at? Yes. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#link-type5 -- Elliotte Rusty Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

2007-03-20 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:00:34 +0100, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There were strong suggestions at the time, I think, that this was part of HTML and should belong to the WHAT-WG. So is there a WHAT-WG document to look at? http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#linkTypes

Autodiscovery Draft

2007-03-19 Thread James M Snell
I'm assuming that since there was no additional expressed interest in moving forward with the Atom autodiscovery draft that it's not going to go anywhere. My current intention is to go ahead and let it expire again without any further modifications. - James

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

2007-03-19 Thread James M Snell
Snell wrote: I'm assuming that since there was no additional expressed interest in moving forward with the Atom autodiscovery draft that it's not going to go anywhere. My current intention is to go ahead and let it expire again without any further modifications. - James

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

2007-03-19 Thread Jan Algermissen
James, what draft do you refer to? Thanks, Jan On 19.03.2007, at 20:50, James M Snell wrote: I'm assuming that since there was no additional expressed interest in moving forward with the Atom autodiscovery draft that it's not going to go anywhere. My current intention is to go ahead

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

2007-03-19 Thread John Panzer
autodiscovery draft that it's not going to go anywhere. My current intention is to go ahead and let it expire again without any further modifications. - James

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

2007-03-19 Thread James M Snell
John Panzer wrote: [snip] Also, is there a standard way to discover the collection associated with a feed? (Given that, if there is an IETF or WHAT-WG way to discover feeds, there's an obvious way to discover collections... but I'm not clear on what that would be. I do think that

Re: Autodiscovery Draft

2007-03-19 Thread Eric Scheid
On 20/3/07 9:00 AM, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also, is there a standard way to discover the collection associated with a feed? (Given that, if there is an IETF or WHAT-WG way to discover feeds, there's an obvious way to discover collections... but I'm not clear on what that would

Autodiscovery Draft Issues

2006-11-28 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Hi, This feedback is related to the autodiscovery draft. Before reading on, I suggest anyone writing a specification of any kind actually learn a little about how to write good conformance criteria. http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1140242962count=1 I do not believe it is at all useful

Re: autodiscovery draft vs namespaces

2006-11-26 Thread James M Snell
Kornel, thanks for the input. In the next rev of the draft (following the initial reboot that should publish in a day or so) I'll see what I can do to clarifying some of these issues. As always, suggested spec text is helpful and encouraged. I will do my best to incorporate all editorial