Re: PaceCollection

2005-02-07 Thread Eric Scheid
PaceCollection +1 yeeouch - I had no idea just how extensive the difference in opinions as to what a feed represents.

Re: PaceCollection

2005-02-03 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
me personally understand the format better - I'm 0 on PaceCollection. cheers Bill

Re: PaceCollection

2005-02-03 Thread Antone Roundy
On Wednesday, February 2, 2005, at 11:55 PM, James Snell wrote: In any case, we're talking about something as simple as the name of a single element. I just don't see any real technical value in changing it's name. It doesn't make processing any easier. It doesn't change any of the functional

PaceCollection

2005-02-02 Thread Eric Scheid
http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceCollection == Abstract == Rename the top level element name for the atom document format which holds a collection of entries, to better communicate it's collection nature, and more easily allow non-feed collections. == Status == Open == Related

Re: PaceCollection

2005-02-02 Thread James Snell
-1. A name change of the top level element accomplishes nothing. On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:55:35 +1100, Eric Scheid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceCollection == Abstract == Rename the top level element name for the atom document format which holds