[redirecting to atom-syntax]
2006/11/1, Houghton,Andrew:
concept scheme URI: http://my.scheme.net/my-vocabulary/
concept URI:http://my.concept.net/my-vocabulary/13745
category
scheme=http://my.scheme.net/my-vocabulary/;
term=http://my.concept.net/my-vocabulary/13745;
On 2 Nov 2006, at 08:59, Thomas Broyer wrote:
[redirecting to atom-syntax]
This is also a protocol issue, because we are asking what to do with
the information in the atom feed. [1]
2006/11/1, Houghton,Andrew:
concept scheme URI: http://my.scheme.net/my-vocabulary/
concept URI:
2006/11/2, Henry Story:
On 2 Nov 2006, at 08:59, Thomas Broyer wrote:
[redirecting to atom-syntax]
This is also a protocol issue, because we are asking what to do with
the information in the atom feed. [1]
Not sure how atom-protocol is concerned but let's keep it in
atom-protocol too...
On 2 Nov 2006, at 12:19, Thomas Broyer wrote:
[[
The term attribute is a string that identifies the category to
which the entry or feed belongs. Category elements MUST have a term
attribute.
]]
nowhere is there mentioned a IRI there,
IRIs are not forbidden either, and Andrew's description
2006/11/2, Henry Story:
On 2 Nov 2006, at 12:19, Thomas Broyer wrote:
[[
The term attribute is a string that identifies the category to
which the entry or feed belongs. Category elements MUST have a term
attribute.
]]
nowhere is there mentioned a IRI there,
IRIs are not forbidden
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Broyer
Sent: 02 November, 2006 06:19
To: Atom-Protocol; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Atom-Syntax
Subject: Re: categories and tagging
2006/11/2, Henry Story:
On 2 Nov 2006, at 08:59, Thomas Broyer wrote:
[redirecting
* Henry Story [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-02 16:55]:
The question is: how does this help any of us? It may look like
it is a term, but what is a client meant to do with all this
information?
Simple: when the scheme and term of two different entries are
identical, then you have confidence that
