On Dec 17, 2005, at 9:01 PM, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
I'm to understand that Atom has adopted the Tag URI as a a perferred.
GUID for an Atom 1.0 feed.
It has not. There is no preferred scheme. -Tim
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 12:01:39AM -0500,
Alan Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
> I'm to understand that Atom has adopted the Tag URI as a a perferred
> GUID for an Atom 1.0 feed. I've begun to use the Tag URI in my work.
RFC 415
* A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-18 06:49]:
> RFC 4287[1] does not mention any scheme at all in normative
> language, and the informal examples in it use UUID URIs.
Ah. I see the long example does use tag URIs, while the short one
uses UUID URIs. Mea culpa.
Regards,
-
* Alan Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-18 06:10]:
> I'm to understand that Atom has adopted the Tag URI as a a
> perferred GUID for an Atom 1.0 feed. I've begun to use the Tag
> URI in my work.
Tag URIs were advertised in Atom 0.3 days, but I don’t know that
th
I'm to understand that Atom has adopted the Tag URI as a a perferred
GUID for an Atom 1.0 feed. I've begun to use the Tag URI in my work.
Eventually, I found myself parsing the Tag URI in Java, and I've
begun to wonder why the Tag URI scheme did not follow the pattern of
a hierarchical URI. It i
