Tim Bray wrote:
Just to see if it uncovered any problems, I twiddled the ongoing
software to generate a format-05 atom feed. It didn't uncover any
problems that I could see. Norm's RNC schema was very valuable in
debugging, not that there were many bugs. Check it out at
On 2/2/05 11:29 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/ongoing.atom
the xmlns and version indicate format-04.
-05 is functionally equivalent to -04 (sans errors)
e.
Julian Reschke wrote:
Tim Bray wrote:
Just to see if it uncovered any problems, I twiddled the ongoing
software to generate a format-05 atom feed. It didn't uncover any
problems that I could see. Norm's RNC schema was very valuable in
debugging, not that there were many bugs. Check it out at
Sam Ruby wrote:
Julian Reschke wrote:
Tim Bray wrote:
Just to see if it uncovered any problems, I twiddled the ongoing
software to generate a format-05 atom feed. It didn't uncover any
problems that I could see. Norm's RNC schema was very valuable in
debugging, not that there were many bugs.
On Feb 2, 2005, at 4:29 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Norm's RNC schema was very valuable in debugging, not that there were
many bugs. Check it out at http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/ongoing.atom
the xmlns and version indicate format-04.
I didn't want to fiddle with Norm's RNC.
P.S. w.r.t. the version
On Feb 2, 2005, at 8:22 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Much to my surprise, scanning the current document, I don't see any
must ignore text.
Hey, we just accepted PaceExtendingAtom 24 hours or so back, give Rob
Mark a chance :)
Just to see if it uncovered any problems, I twiddled the ongoing
software to generate a format-05 atom feed. It didn't uncover any
problems that I could see. Norm's RNC schema was very valuable in
debugging, not that there were many bugs. Check it out at
