On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 12:46 -0700, James Cerra wrote:
Please can we have an informative version of the spec,
with the semantics explained.
Current version, for thicko's|users, like me, is
not good.
How hard is one little change?
I'm not looking for a change. That has been
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : Feed History: Enabling Stateful Syndication
Author(s) : M. Nottingham
Filename: draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-00.txt
Pages : 6
Mark Nottingham wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : Feed History: Enabling Stateful Syndication
Author(s) : M. Nottingham
Filename: draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-00.txt
Let's say we are planning to keep the latest 15 entries in our stateful
feed. We publish the first entry, and have a feed with 1 entry in it.
It has a this link, but no prev link.
Then we add an entry. The old this link can't be used to point to
the new instance of the feed, right?
Hi Antone,
Thanks for the comments. This draft was admittedly rough, but I
wanted to get an idea of people's general reactions before refining
it too much. In particular, I'd be interested in implementors'
reactions (e.g., aggregators, publishers).
Responses below.
Then we add an
Thanks Garrett, I'll take this into account if I do another draft.
Cheers,
On 28/06/2005, at 1:39 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Mark Nottingham wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-
Drafts directories.
Title : Feed History: Enabling Stateful
Thinking a little more about this, I'm not sure what the this link
would be used for. The prev link seems to be doing all the work, and
especially assuming a batches of 15 sort of model, the this link
seems likely to end up pointing to a document that's going to disappear
soon 14 times out
