James M Snell wrote:
b. recommended inclusion of a source element in signed entries.
+1
bob wyman
Mark Nottingham wrote:
This draft is based on comments received; thanks to everyone. Major
changes;
* Removed 'this' link
* Changed link syntax
* Changed stateful syntax
* Clarified difference between 'subscription' and 'archive' feeds
(note that they're just for the purposes of clarity
Greetings again. The clearing a discuss thread has been productive,
but the proposed wording has changed a few times. Here is what I
suggest is good final wording that covers the issues brought up.
Comments are welcome.
5. Securing Atom Documents
Because Atom is an XML-based format,
I believe it would be very useful to specify that signed entries should
include a source element. This can/should be considered part of entry
canonicalization.
The reason I suggest this is that signed entries are only really useful
when extracted from their original source feeds. If
On Jul 4, 2005, at 7:38 PM, Bob Wyman wrote:
I believe it would be very useful to specify that signed entries
should include a source element. This can/should be considered
part of entry canonicalization.
-1. Leave it to the market. I suspect that you're right, but I'd be
