Using Sun's 'relames' [1] it is *nearly* possible to
validate an instance as is intended by the text!
Where (datetime for instance) an element content
must not have whitespace, relames picks it up nicely.
element name=atom:published
s:assert test=normalize-space(.) = .There must be no
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 17:45 +0200, Danny Ayers wrote:
I don't want to allow whitespace. But this
id
urn:foo
/id
is going to happen, is going to cause problems, and working around it
does not strike me as being something you can foist entirely onto the
spec's end-users.
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:24 +0100, Bill de hÓra wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Even if we decide that whitespace is not significant, I do believe that
having the feedvalidator issue a warning in such cases is appropriate.
+1
What is the IETF version of an errata sheet? Is that the right
place
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 19:11 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
For RFCs see http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html.
Thanks.
Just playing.
With schema
define name=uriTest
element name=test
oneOrMore
element name=uri
attribute name=href
data type=anyURI/
/attribute
data type=anyURI/
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 09:14 -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote:
Archives *should not* change. I think any librarian will agree with
that.
I very much agree that this is the ideal that should be striven for.
The underlying problem, I think, is that different feeds have
different
If anyone comes to a definitive conclusion on this,
would they post to the list, or a website please.
TIA
--
Regards,
Dave Pawson
XSLT + Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
://www.topologi.com/products/validator/ is said to support it.
I used Norm's relax-ng schema + msv.
Seems good to me?
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/nodesets/nodesets.xml You tell me if it's
bad[==invalid]
The spec doesn't ... in language I understand.
--
Regards,
Dave Pawson
XSLT + Docbook FAQ
http
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 12:16 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| I'm wondering which validator was used for testing the Atom
| RNG+Schematron schema. Which validators support Compact Syntax with
| embedded Schematron? I am particularly interested in
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 16:13 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Paul, two points.
For me to be happy, your specification must mandate that xmldsig be
used whenever encryption is used.
As a consequence of this and your decision not to support MACs, then
in order to encrypt a document, you must sign
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:03 +0200, Thomas Broyer wrote:
Dave Pawson wrote:
Any one site could now have n instances, each being a feed, the only
variant (apart from entries) being the links to previous feeds.
If I'm to say *this* is my feed, I guess I point to the most recent...
which
believe is the interop issue.
--
Regards,
Dave Pawson
XSLT + Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
or change its type to a Link Construct.
I support the rationale for changing. I'd appreciate even more
some semantics for the element?
Were you going to add those to the proposal?
--
Regards,
Dave Pawson
XSLT + Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
,
Dave Pawson
XSLT + Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
?
--
Regards,
Dave Pawson
XSLT + Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
I'm not having much luck working
out how I can write (daily or there abouts)
an entry, without having to duplicate
feed metadata.
Am I alone in this?
Xinsert isn't common yet.. is it?
--
Regards,
Dave Pawson
XSLT + Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/blog/
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 12:09 -0700, James Cerra wrote:
Dave Pawson,
I'm not having much luck working
out how I can write (daily or there abouts)
an entry, without having to duplicate
feed metadata.
I don't follow. Could you give an example showing the duplicated metadata?
Process
16 matches
Mail list logo
