At 3:29 PM -0500 2/8/05, Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| -1 on the regex. It's completely
| unreadable and hides whatever
| additional constraints it adds. Write
| those down in English please.
Well, how about English and the regex?
+1 to having both. It gives u
/ Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| -1 on the regex. It's completely
| unreadable and hides whatever
| additional constraints it adds. Write
| those down in English please.
Well, how about English and the regex? I'm worrying about
interoperability here. There's considerable pressure t
-1 on the regex. It's completely unreadable and hides whatever
additional constraints it adds. Write those down in English please.
Graham
> PaceDatesXSD
+1
+1. Our AD has told us how to write this section, so the Pace just adds
the regex, which I'm in favor of. Sam's suggestion at the end could
easily be accomodated with a sentence saying "As a result, the date
values are valid according to [RFC3339], [XML-SCHEMA], and [w3cdtf]."
Robert Sayre
Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| On 6/2/05 9:38 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> I am +1 on the regular expression limitation,
|> believe that all dates that that conform to this limitation are valid
|> RFC 3339 and xsd:dateTime values, and bel
/ Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| On 6/2/05 9:38 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> I am +1 on the regular expression limitation,
|> believe that all dates that that conform to this limitation are valid
|> RFC 3339 and xsd:dateTime values, and believe that it will in
On 6/2/05 9:38 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am +1 on the regular expression limitation,
> believe that all dates that that conform to this limitation are valid
> RFC 3339 and xsd:dateTime values, and believe that it will interop with
> all of the existing XSD implementations.
wh
> Having written the datetime support for Apache Axis (a
> webservice implementation based on XSD schema and having
> hosted a number of SOAP interop facilities, I am +1 on the
> regular expression limitation, believe that all dates that
> that conform to this limitation are valid RFC 3339 and
Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| I tend to agree as well; in this case, the fact that this is an XML
| vocabulary is probably more relevant than the fact that it's an IETF
| RFC. So can we please have a Pace to call out to XSD? I'm pretty
Do
10 matches
Mail list logo
