James,
There is an interop service for Atom 1.0 feed/entry signature
validation available (with source code for both service and
Wordpress plugin) as part of the Signed Ping initiative at
http://signedping.com
Let me know if you need more info.
-Hans
-Original Message-
From:
Hello Thomas,
Thank you for taking the time to review the draft. I have cc'd this
response to the atom-syntax list so that others in the Atom community
can comment.
Comments below.
Thomas Roessler wrote:
Hi Mike, James, pleased to meet you.
I'm adding Wendy Seltzer to the CC list, who (I
Hey Mike,
Thanks for taking another look. Comments below.
Mike Linksvayer wrote:
Hi James,
The atom license extension was brought to my attention again. I'm not
sure what concerns Thomas Roessler (cc'd) has below (I've also cc'd Lisa
Dusseault as she mentioned the extension to me
Hello Wendy,
Thanks for the feedback. I've cc'd the atom-syntax list so the rest of
the Atom community can comment.
Comments below.
Wendy Seltzer wrote:
Hi all,
So my first thoughts upon seeing the draft are to wonder why it's
necessary to make assertions about the legal effects of
At 04:08 PM 9/5/2006 -0700, James M Snell wrote:
Hello Wendy,
Thanks for the feedback. I've cc'd the atom-syntax list so the rest of
the Atom community can comment.
Thanks James,
I'm still not clear on what's happening in 1.1.
1.1 It must also be noted that licenses associated with
Comments below.
Wendy Seltzer wrote:
[snip]
Thanks James,
I'm still not clear on what's happening in 1.1.
[snip]
To this point I've received exactly the opposite feedback from others
(all of whom weren't lawyers, btw, but who have had experience with
licensing issues in the past).
It
Mike Linksvayer wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:53 -0700, James M Snell wrote:
Mike Linksvayer wrote:
In any case, the draft says the referenced license only applies to feed
or entry metadata, not content. This strikes me as not particularly
useful and does not match analogous extentions
James M Snell wrote:
Mike Linksvayer wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:53 -0700, James M Snell wrote:
Mike Linksvayer wrote:
In any case, the draft says the referenced license only applies to feed
or entry metadata, not content. This strikes
