On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 01:21:09 +0100, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose you could raise this on the WHATWG list. Asking what happens
if you set innerHTML of a div where the setted value has both a
base and an a for instance.
Interesting. I hadn't thought that Atom was supposed
* Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-02 01:35]:
I hadn't thought that Atom was supposed to use innerHTML
parsing. I'd have said that you prepend
!DOCTYPE htmltitle/titlediv to what travels in the
feed and append /div to it, parse the resulting string and
grab the first div in the
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 02:12:14 +0100, James Holderness
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well that's not really what I've learnt. I've learnt that there are a
lot of broken feeds out there (Atom as well as RSS) and that users are
less than impressed when you tell them it's not your fault and they
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:40:53 +0100, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-02 01:35]:
I hadn't thought that Atom was supposed to use innerHTML
parsing. I'd have said that you prepend
!DOCTYPE htmltitle/titlediv to what travels in the
feed and append
On Jan 2, 2007, at 12:40, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-02 01:35]:
I hadn't thought that Atom was supposed to use innerHTML
parsing. I'd have said that you prepend
!DOCTYPE htmltitle/titlediv to what travels in the
feed and append /div to it, parse the
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
So if a feed is non-well-formed you should just parse it as well using
some tag soup parser for XML?
Well that's what I do. The Google Reader blog post I quoted estimated that
about seven percent of feeds contained XML errors of some kind. That's a lot
of feeds for
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:38:33 +0100, Geoffrey Sneddon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we come across something like: description type=html![CDATA
[base url=http://example.com/;a href=test.htmlTest Link/a]]
/description,
Yikes!
I assume the link should point to http://example.com/test.html,
On 1 Jan 2007, at 16:59, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
Like James Holderness wrote,
Eek! I should keep up with emails better!
the base element has no place in an HTML fragment, so its meaning
is (although most browsers wrongfully supports its presence
anywhere in an HTML document)
2007/1/1, Geoffrey Sneddon:
On 1 Jan 2007, at 16:59, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
the base element has no place in an HTML fragment, so its meaning
is (although most browsers wrongfully supports its presence
anywhere in an HTML document) unspecified.
Web Applications 1.0 (keeping with the real
* Geoffrey Sneddon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-01 19:00]:
On 1 Jan 2007, at 16:59, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
the base element has no place in an HTML fragment, so its
meaning is (although most browsers wrongfully supports its
presence anywhere in an HTML document) unspecified.
Web Applications
On 1/1/07, Geoffrey Sneddon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why, may I
ask, MUST (under the RFC 2119 definition) HTML
content be a fragment (HTML markup within SHOULD be such
that it could validly appear directly within an HTML DIV
element, after unescaping. - note the word SHOULD, not
MUST, implying
On 1 Jan 2007, at 19:22, Bob Wyman wrote:
If you want a local base, then use xml:base. That's what it is for.
When the spec says you SHOULD treat html content as if it were in a
DIV, it adds a certain amount of unclarity as how such Atom feeds
should be parsed. I'm asking merely to see
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:22:33 +0100, Geoffrey Sneddon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want a local base, then use xml:base. That's what it is for.
When the spec says you SHOULD treat html content as if it were in a
DIV, it adds a certain amount of unclarity as how such Atom feeds
should
Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
When the spec says you SHOULD treat html content as if it were in a
DIV, it adds a certain amount of unclarity as how such Atom feeds
should be parsed. I'm asking merely to see if there's any consensus as to
how it should be done. I have no control over the vast
-1. If there's anything we can learn from the mess that is RSS, at a
certain point feed consumers should be allowed to say simply that a
buggy feed is a buggy feed and that it falls on the responsibility of
the feed publisher to get things right.
- James
James Holderness wrote:
[snip]
Do you
On Jan 1, 2007, at 22:46, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I suppose you could raise this on the WHATWG list. Asking what
happens if you set innerHTML of a div where the setted value has
both a base and an a for instance.
Interesting. I hadn't thought that Atom was supposed to use innerHTML
James M Snell wrote:
-1. If there's anything we can learn from the mess that is RSS, at a
certain point feed consumers should be allowed to say simply that a
buggy feed is a buggy feed and that it falls on the responsibility of
the feed publisher to get things right.
Well that's not really
Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
If we come across something like: description type=html![CDATA
[base url=http://example.com/;a href=test.htmlTest Link/a]]
/description, I assume the link should point to http://
example.com/test.html, due to the base element?
Not necessarily. The base element should
18 matches
Mail list logo
