-syntax@imc.org
Subject: Re: IE7 Atom Handling (was RE: Link rel attribute stylesheet)
Hi Sean,
I've been testing IE7 beta 2's support for Atom, with the following
test feed:
http://djpowell.net/atom-test/hardfeed/feed/hard-feed.atom
Also here for easier viewing in IE7
http://djpowell.net/atom-test
Hi Sean,
I've been testing IE7 beta 2's support for Atom, with the following
test feed:
http://djpowell.net/atom-test/hardfeed/feed/hard-feed.atom
Also here for easier viewing in IE7
http://djpowell.net/atom-test/hardfeed/feed/hard-feed.xml
Here are the problems that I have found:
01.
David Powell wrote:
03. atom:published
While atom:updated is converted to pubDate, atom:published is kept as
atom:published; except, the date format is converted to RFC822 format.
I think that the date format should be kept as-is in ISO8601-style
format.
Why is atom:updated converted to
On Feb 26, 2006, at 9:10 PM, James Yenne wrote:
My feeds contain a generic xml-stylesheet, which formats the feed
for display along with a feed-specific css. Since xsl processors
do not have a standard way to pass parameters to xsl stylesheets, I
provide this feed-specific css to the xsl
When you say what it was designed for can you be specific as to what that definition is? Sorry, new to the conversation, but I have particular interest in this topic as it is my belief that the URI/IRI can be used to imply a lot of information that is otherwise hidden from view, or uses more
to
have stylesheet added to the List of Relations.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Antone Roundy
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 7:05 AM
To: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: Re: Link rel attribute stylesheet
On Feb 26, 2006, at 9:10 PM, James
James Yenne wrote:
[snip]
correct doctype. Perhaps the CSS2 media attribute, if added to Atom links
would provide this cue about the format... E.g. media=print, handheld.
Take a look at
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-link-extensions-02.txt
It's completely
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M. David
PetersonSent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 10:50 PMTo: James
YenneCc: atom-syntax@imc.orgSubject: Re: Link rel
attribute "stylesheet"
If you quickly check the list archives you will notice that this very
conversation is taking place directly
On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:29 AM, M. David Peterson wrote:
When you say what it was designed for can you be specific as to
what that definition is?
Well, we failed to gain consensus on that. Some of us wanted it to
be used only for links intended to be traversed by the user (like the
a element
On 2/27/06, Antone Roundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm.If I'm reading that right, I wouldn't want to organize mywebsites that way.
Nor would I. I wouldn't advocate and actual directory structure as this, and instead a simple disection of the URI/IRI that would then be mapped to the proper
Sean Lyndersay wrote:
Thanks James. I’ve filed bugs in our bug tracking database for each of
the issues that came up in the feed validator (except for flagging
/atom:*/ items, since these are a correct use of RSS 2.0 extension
namespaces).
Re the flagging of atom: elements: this was indeed a
I've been experimenting with the use of rel=stylesheet to provide a
relatively safe way of attaching styles to syndicated content. The
dangers of allowing embedded styles in syndicated content are well known
[1], however, it still makes sense to provide an optional way of
allowing publishers and
Neat idea :)
Why does IE7 rip out xml-stylesheet directives.
I can only assume your server is serving up the atom file (correctly) as application/atom+xml? If yes, application/atom+xml is transfered directly to the feed rendering mechanism, bypassing the xml parsing mechanism that would read the
correction:
serving the .xml extension as with an application/xml extension
should read: serving the .xml extension as with an application/xml MIME-type (bunch of other spelling and grammar errors, but I would rather not waste everyones time showcasing something most already know... a first take
be
useful in entries also.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of A. Pagaltzis
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 8:43 PM
To: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: Re: Link rel attribute stylesheet
* James Yenne [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-27 05:25]:
My feeds
* James Yenne [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-27 07:20]:
as James Snell shows, they can be useful in entries also.
Yeah, I hadn’t thought about it in terms of styling content in
standalone aggregators, only as a hatch for XSL transforms
applied for friendlier in-browser presentation.
For the
channel element: link [help]
lt;/divgt;/descriptioncf:id2/cf:idcf:readtrue/cf:read/item/ ...
From: M. David Peterson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 8:53
PMTo: James YenneCc:
atom-syntax@imc.orgSubject: Re: Link rel attribute
"stylesheet"
correction:
servin
/ ...
From: M. David Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 8:53 PM
To: James YenneCc: atom-syntax@imc.orgSubject: Re: Link rel attribute stylesheet
correction:
serving the .xml extension as with an application/xml extension
should read: serving the .xml extension
18 matches
Mail list logo
