On Fri, Jul 24, 2015, at 01:45 PM, Tomas Radej wrote:
Hi all,
Please include this patch that switches the Atomic Host manifest from
Python 2-based packages to Python 3. This change is necessary due to the
Python 3 as Default Fedora Change
On 07/17/2015 04:09 AM, Alec Taylor wrote:
How would I go about setting up something similar with Project Atomic's
ecosystem?
Happy to contribute some elbow-grease!
Apologies for the delay, I've been traveling.
So - I'm not sure where you'd start, to be honest. This sounds a bit
outside
On 07/27/2015 11:33 AM, Eric Paris wrote:
So I haven't dug into this, might be wasting people's time, but
upstream kube ansible has some 'pre-ansible' tasks to get Rawhide boxes
functional with ansible [1]. The bare minimum appears (related to
atomic) to be python2 and libselinux-python.
I
So I haven't dug into this, might be wasting people's time, but
upstream kube ansible has some 'pre-ansible' tasks to get Rawhide boxes
functional with ansible [1]. The bare minimum appears (related to
atomic) to be python2 and libselinux-python.
I know we added python2 by hand, just want to ask
Hi.
Sadly, no, the only step you missed was disabling SELinux.
That is not mentioned in the getting started guide. Is there some
estimate when it might be fixed?
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/kubernetes/issues/2630
Is where Paul is tracking his work around these problems
It
The conntrack command from conntrack-tools is needed to for the
least-disruptive work-around for Docker bug 8795.
See: https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/8795
If there's some command already in the Atomic host that can do the equivalent
of `conntrack -D ...`, I'd love to know about it.
On Jul 27, 2015, at 11:47, Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/27/2015 02:42 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
If there's some command already in the Atomic host that can do the
equivalent of `conntrack -D ...`, I'd love to know about it. Otherwise,
conntrack-tools should
On 07/27/2015 04:51 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 07/27/2015 04:48 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
On 07/27/2015 02:42 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
If there's some command already in the Atomic host that can do the
equivalent of `conntrack -D ...`, I'd love to know about it.
On 07/27/2015 04:48 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
On 07/27/2015 02:42 PM, Erik Swanson (eriswans) wrote:
If there's some command already in the Atomic host that can do the
equivalent of `conntrack -D ...`, I'd love to know about it. Otherwise,
conntrack-tools should probably
