On Saturday 01 November 2008 07:30:29 pm Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Given that disk size doubles every 1-2 years (with corresponding drops
in price), I would hope that the cost of keeping old rpms available
wouuld be now quite near minimal (and as I mentioned before, if it
would help, I would
Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:09:04AM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Monday 18 August 2008 11:25:53 am Anthony Messina wrote:
On Monday 18 August 2008 04:21:14 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:15:11PM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote
On Sunday 26 October 2008 09:39:48 am Larry K wrote:
I looked for a mirror site I could point yum to, but did not find one.
Does one exist that is not dependent upon this site being up?
i host a selective, low-bandwidth mirror at
http://messinet.com/pub/mirror/dl.atrpms.net/
-a
--
Anthony -
Just a ping so see if some updated F9 MythTV RPMs are on the way. Thank you.
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 18 October 2008 10:09:56 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 07:22:57AM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
Just a ping so see if some updated F9 MythTV RPMs are on the way. Thank
you.
OK, I'll do a respin.
thank you sir. i know you've been busy with the baby
On Monday 18 August 2008 11:25:53 am Anthony Messina wrote:
On Monday 18 August 2008 04:21:14 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:15:11PM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
ASthe first tarballs for DAHDI, the Zaptel replacement, are being
released, are there any plans to have
On Friday 03 October 2008 01:45:59 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:13:13AM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
Fedor Pikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Herbert Carl Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think the sept 28 update of libdvdcss has knocked
On Friday 03 October 2008 10:58:50 am John Pilkington wrote:
Keeping shared libraries in a separate package enables their use as
forward/backward compatibility packages
i see. thank you sir.
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE
On Monday 18 August 2008 03:09:13 pm Axel Thimm wrote:
Why not do it with kmdls from the start? Later one needs to cater for
upgrade paths from the non-kmdl packaging etc.
no real reason. i just don't have my system set up for that. i only build a
few packages and mostly have them customized
On Monday 18 August 2008 04:21:14 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:15:11PM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
ASthe first tarballs for DAHDI, the Zaptel replacement, are being
released, are there any plans to have the rpms built at ATrpms?
Yes, certainly. I'll try to get this done
ASthe first tarballs for DAHDI, the Zaptel replacement, are being released,
are there any plans to have the rpms built at ATrpms?
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Friday 11 July 2008 06:06:01 am John Robinson wrote:
On 09/07/2008 10:59, OM Ugarcina wrote:
It is getting too hard to keep up , And I am thinking to go over to
Centos - much less updating going on .
I switched a while ago, I had used Red Hat Linux and skipped every other
one of those,
John Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know how F9 is behaving with Atrpms packages.
Mainly:
1) is nividia 173 working with 3D acceleration?
snip
As far as the nvidia 173 drivers from the ATrpms repo, I had more
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 01:46:00 pm John Welch wrote:
ATrpms repo.
the patch is included in the spec file:
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/nvidia-graphics169.12.spec
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 07:01:35 pm DISAFAN wrote:
the patch is included in the spec file:
http://dl.atrpms.net/all/nvidia-graphics169.12.spec
Well, regardless, it doesn't seem to work. I get a message that states the
driver is not compatible with the version of XORG.
bummer. i haven't
On Saturday 15 March 2008 06:27:07 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 05:29:38PM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Thursday 28 February 2008 05:07:19 pm Anthony Messina wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2008 01:40:42 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:58:42PM -0600
On Saturday 08 March 2008 06:50:01 am mythtv wrote:
Is the ivtv-kmdl package still needed with ivtv support in the stock F8
kernel? I've removed the ivtv kernel module but am still able to record.
Hans
Harry Orenstein wrote:
Axel,
There seems to be an incorrect dependency in the
On Thursday 31 January 2008 01:40:42 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:58:42PM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 06:00:06 pm Axel Thimm wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:25:45PM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
Axel, I'm not sure if you still have
On Thursday 31 January 2008 01:40:42 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:58:42PM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 06:00:06 pm Axel Thimm wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:25:45PM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
Axel, I'm not sure if you still have
On Monday 25 February 2008 06:45:41 am Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:34 AM, OM Ugarcina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Axel,
I just took the latest myth update ver 174 on my FC 8 box . After
completing the update with yum I restarted the machine . The machine
seemed
On Monday 25 February 2008 06:50:10 am Anthony Messina wrote:
you don't need to. just comment out the following line
in /etc/init.d/mythbackend:
daemon --user mythtv $binary $OPTIONS
the above works, but skip this part:
and add a $ before HOME in the export HOME just a few lines above
Would anyone be able to take a look at
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11963 and let me know how to proceed? I
don't build these rpms as I use the ones graciously provided here.
Is there a -debuginfo rpm that could be used so I would not have to rebuild
the whole thing?
Thanks, Anthony
--
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 06:00:06 pm Axel Thimm wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:25:45PM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
Axel, I'm not sure if you still have the old zaptel (1.4.7) rpms, I seem
to be having trouble with the 1.4.8 version reliably transmitting DTMF.
I you still have
Axel, I'm not sure if you still have the old zaptel (1.4.7) rpms, I seem to be
having trouble with the 1.4.8 version reliably transmitting DTMF.
I you still have the 1.4.7 version available for f7-x86_64 and f7-i386
available, I'd LOVE to have them back :(
For whatever reason, the repos are
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 06:00:06 pm Axel Thimm wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:25:45PM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
Axel, I'm not sure if you still have the old zaptel (1.4.7) rpms, I seem
to be having trouble with the 1.4.8 version reliably transmitting DTMF.
I you still have
I noticed that the zaptel 1.4 and associated kmdls are no longer in the f7 or
f8 i386 or x86_64 repos. I do use these and was wondering if there would be
continued support? Thank you. -Anthony
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE
On Friday 25 January 2008 09:51:22 pm Anthony Messina wrote:
I noticed that the zaptel 1.4 and associated kmdls are no longer in the f7
or f8 i386 or x86_64 repos. I do use these and was wondering if there would
be continued support? Thank you. -Anthony
never mind. i see the 1.4.8 src rpm
On Saturday 26 January 2008 12:57:35 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 11:31:44PM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008 09:51:22 pm Anthony Messina wrote:
I noticed that the zaptel 1.4 and associated kmdls are no longer in the
f7 or f8 i386 or x86_64 repos. I
On Saturday 26 January 2008 01:33:02 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 01:13:02AM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008 12:57:35 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 11:31:44PM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Friday 25 January 2008 09:51:22 pm
On Thursday 24 January 2008 06:20:40 am Torbjörn Abrahamsson wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if you have plans to create RPMs for Asterisk 1.4.17. The
latest version you have is 1.4.16.2 which contains a bug regarding sip
peer selection when using realtime.
For F7 or F8? They are both in the stable
On Thursday 24 January 2008 09:01:41 am Torbjörn Abrahamsson wrote:
Anthony Messina wrote:
On Thursday 24 January 2008 06:20:40 am Torbjörn Abrahamsson wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if you have plans to create RPMs for Asterisk 1.4.17. The
latest version you have is 1.4.16.2 which contains
axel, thanks for the res_snmp fix. in the next run, would you be able to bump
the asterisk version to 1.4.16.2? i'm looking for the oops fixes they had
to make to 1.4.16.1 here:
http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/asterisk/ChangeLog-1.4.16.2
thanks. i'll be working on using the res_snmp
Please check out this bug report (now closed):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426490
Would it be reasonable and/or possible to have the asterisk-addons at ATrpms
be compatible with the asterisk packages from Fedora?
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com -
On Friday 21 December 2007 06:57:46 pm Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Asterisk now comes with Fedora ?
On Dec 22, 2007 6:07 AM, Anthony Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please check out this bug report (now closed):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426490
Would it be reasonable
On Sunday 09 December 2007 12:53:36 pm Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 12:42:27AM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
Asterisk 1.4 is said to have rudimentarty SNMP support via the
res_snmp.so module, however, it does not appear to be included in (at
least the) x86_64 version
they've released a security update for sql injections...
http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/ChangeLog-addons-1.4.4
thanks. -a
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 11:13:52 am Anthony Messina wrote:
they've released a security update for sql injections...
http://downloads.digium.com/pub/asterisk/ChangeLog-addons-1.4.4
thanks. -a
wow, thanks!
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89
When using Asterisk 1.4 from ATrpms, which spandsp rpms should be used? The
pre0.0.4 from Fedora's repo, or the 0.0.3 from ATrpms' repo? Or does it
matter?
Thanks, Anthony
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 08:14:12 am Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:03:25AM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
When using Asterisk 1.4 from ATrpms, which spandsp rpms should be used?
The pre0.0.4 from Fedora's repo, or the 0.0.3 from ATrpms' repo? Or does
it matter?
When
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 10:12:37 pm Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Gabe Rubin wrote at about 17:48:05 -0800 on Wednesday, November 14, 2007:
On Nov 14, 2007 5:25 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mythtvsetup gave me an error when running with selinux enforcing:
Do
Axel, do your MythTV RPMs include the fix outlined here:
http://svn.mythtv.org/trac/ticket/3598 ?
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 22 October 2007 08:38:29 pm Anthony Messina wrote:
Have there been any build issues with asterisk-1.4.13 and/or zaptel-1.4.6
for x86_64?
I haven't tried to build myself yet 'cause your builds are usually so darn
quick. -A
Got'em. Thanks Axel.
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 09:37:36 am Axel Thimm wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 11:06:55AM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2007 12:55:01 pm Anthony Messina wrote:
i was wondering 2 things (well more than that, but for this issue...)
1. is there a reason why
On Sunday 07 October 2007 09:10:42 am Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
anyone getting xv instability with this new nvidia driver?
Sometimes when using mplayer, xine or mythtv the video area gets all green
(or stripped).
Restarting the player sometimes fixes the video. Upgrading SDL to
On Friday 31 August 2007 12:55:01 pm Anthony Messina wrote:
i was wondering 2 things (well more than that, but for this issue...)
1. is there a reason why v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg is not in the ivtv-firmware
package
2. is there a reason why v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg is placed in /lib/modules
On Thursday 30 August 2007 10:37:38 am Anthony Messina wrote:
should the 1.0.2 ivtv package require the ivtv-kmdl? i can see that the
ivtv-kmdl package should require ivtv. i am using the fedora 2.6.22 kernel,
so i'd prefer to use the built-in kernel module if possible.
yum --enablerepo
i was wondering 2 things (well more than that, but for this issue...)
1. is there a reason why v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg is not in the ivtv-firmware
package
2. is there a reason why v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg is placed in /lib/modules
instead of /lib/firmware
the reason i ask is because, with selinux
should the 1.0.2 ivtv package require the ivtv-kmdl? i can see that the
ivtv-kmdl package should require ivtv. i am using the fedora 2.6.22 kernel,
so i'd prefer to use the built-in kernel module if possible.
yum --enablerepo=atrpms update
Loading kmdl plugin
Setting up Update Process
Resolving
sorry if i'm the one who's missing something, but shouldn't there be a
chan_zap.so module in asterisk x86_64?
i sure hope so as i sort of took it for granted after installing asterisk on
an i386, then an x86_64, assuming it would be there.
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com -
On Thursday 09 August 2007 12:18:52 pm Anthony Messina wrote:
sorry if i'm the one who's missing something, but shouldn't there be a
chan_zap.so module in asterisk x86_64?
i sure hope so as i sort of took it for granted after installing asterisk
on an i386, then an x86_64, assuming it would
On Thursday 09 August 2007 01:53:57 pm Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:16:16PM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Thursday 09 August 2007 12:18:52 pm Anthony Messina wrote:
sorry if i'm the one who's missing something, but shouldn't there be a
chan_zap.so module in asterisk
On Thursday 09 August 2007 01:53:57 pm Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:16:16PM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Thursday 09 August 2007 12:18:52 pm Anthony Messina wrote:
sorry if i'm the one who's missing something, but shouldn't there be a
chan_zap.so module in asterisk
Anthony Messina wrote:
Axel, if CallWeaver (http://www.callweaver.org), formerly OpenPBX, is
not able to be included in FC7 due to any core/extras/timeline inclusion
rules, would you be willing/interested in packaging CallWeaver for FC7?
it looks like things at fedora are moving in the right
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:07:46PM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
Axel, if CallWeaver (http://www.callweaver.org), formerly OpenPBX, is
not able to be included in FC7 due to any core/extras/timeline inclusion
rules, would you be willing/interested in packaging CallWeaver
in an attempt to update to the latest zaptel-kmdl-2.6.20-1.2948 for fc6,
i receive the following error:
can't install zaptel-kmdl-2.6.20-1.2948.fc6-1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
no package provides zaptel = 1:1.4.2.1-32.fc6
it appears that the .at was left off the requirement for zaptel, so
should it not
http://ftp.digium.com/pub/zaptel/ChangeLog-1.4.1
2007-03-22 Kevin P. Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Zaptel 1.4.0 released.
http://ftp.digium.com/pub/zaptel/zaptel-1.4.1.tar.gz
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC
i just read about the build issues that prevented the alsa-kmdls from
being built for the new kernel.
i also noticed that the zaptel-kmdls are available for 1.2, but not 1.4.
by chance, were there issues with that one too? thanks axel.
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com -
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 21:54 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 03:33:15PM -0500, Anthony Messina wrote:
i just read about the build issues that prevented the alsa-kmdls from
being built for the new kernel.
i also noticed that the zaptel-kmdls are available for 1.2
will there be an alsa-kmdl for 2.6.18-1.2869.fc6? with the trouble i've
had since the dns issue, i've had to remove and re-download some of
smart's xml files. i don't see it in the repo, but all the other kmdls
seems to have been built.
thanks.
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com -
59 matches
Mail list logo
