Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2006-03-02) writes:
>
>> you probably noticed that I've gone deader than usual on the lists.
>
> And I always thought death is binary.
Well, the mailing list server is breathing in gasps right now. I
gues
Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Re: TeX-insert-punctuation and
> TeX-error-messages
> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:03:19 +0100
>
>> Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
ot started?
How can the error output from the process be in an encoding different
from what actually is in the TeX file?
I don't get it. Maybe because I don't know enough about Japanese TeX
variants. Can you tell us some details?
--
David
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2006-02-07) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> (TeX-command-list): Use `TeX-run-function' instead of
>>> `TeX-run-ispell-on-document' for "
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ralf Angeli (2006-02-05) writes:
>
>> As mentioned on the general mailing list I had a little bit of code
>> for cleaning generated files I wanted to generalize.
>
> Checked into CVS.
"Wipe"? "Xpunge&
Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: TeX-insert-punctuation and TeX-error-messages
> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:17:17 +0100
>
>> > # Maybe, we should brush up TeX-error-messages for LaTeX2e...
>>
el.
Things like "TeX-run-ispell-on-document" should be kept as aliases for
the sake of older customizations.
Anyway, why use a string here as argument for TeX-run-function? Seems
ugly, when actually a list is used.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
__
combined a listing of the files) should be added.
>
> Yep.
Well, one can see how "x" in dired asks for confirmation.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
too much DWIM, but if it's explicitly documented and the
> user already can see examples, it should be okay.
I don't like this. One could use a list of strings, and instead of a
string you can also use '(regexp . "\\.sty\\'") or so. I think I have
seen some co
open-brace
and opening-math functionality by default.
I seemed to remember we had converged on something like this, and so I
was a bit surprised to see the default value of nil.
Any input? What do persons who are using filling often and are aware
of that option tend to use?
--
David Ka
Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:16:25 +0100
>
>> Uh, no. It _special-cases_ those two operating systems, but I don't
>
Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-diffs] Changes to auctex/ChangeLog
> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:08:28 +0100
>
>> Masayuki Ataka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > In
tforms.
Is there a good reason for removing the run-dviout functionality,
given that such platforms are definitely in use?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 20 2006, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> On *BSD, one can't build the package, without hand-editing the
>>> Makefile or similar wo
Jiri Pejchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 18/01/06, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Also I'd like to have TeX-fold-mode on by default. I added
>> > (TeX-fold-mode 1) to LaTeX-mode-hook.
>>
>> Well, I have my doubts that
l font.
If they weren't before, it is my guess that you did something wrong
with the hook, and the mode bombs out before it gets to working on the
fontification settings.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel maili
Index: auctex/preview/preview.el
diff -u auctex/preview/preview.el:1.263 auctex/preview/preview.el:1.264
--- auctex/preview/preview.el:1.263 Fri Jan 13 22:04:14 2006
+++ auctex/preview/preview.el Tue Jan 17 18:06:40 2006
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
;;; Commentary:
-;; $Id: preview.el,v 1.263 2006/
CVSROOT:/sources/auctex
Module name:auctex
Branch:
Changes by: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/01/17 18:06:40
Modified files:
preview: preview.el ChangeLog
Log message:
(preview-TeX-style-cooked): New function, to be used
Index: auctex/preview/ChangeLog
diff -u auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.826 auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.827
--- auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.826 Sat Jan 14 17:46:39 2006
+++ auctex/preview/ChangeLogTue Jan 17 18:06:40 2006
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2006-01-17 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTEC
quot; character there at the end (maybe
from a previous installation), we can of course leave it there. But
other than that, we should not put it there in the first place.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
ot;info/$$i.info" >>
"pkginfo/MANIFEST.$(PACKAGE)" ; \
done && \
echo "pkginfo/MANIFEST.$(PACKAGE)" >> "pkginfo/MANIFEST.$(PACKAGE)" ;
\
}
As you can see, tex-site.el is appended at the end of the autoload
data.
I
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2006-01-16) writes:
>
>> More specifically: I have just handed in abstracts for the
>> Chemnitzer Linuxtage (a seriously great conference I've been
>> visiting for years on end) and the Dante-Tagung in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Faulhammer) writes:
> Tach David, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
>
> David Kastrup schrieb:
> [Gentoo Ebuilds for AUCTeX]
>> Well, but there is nothing we need to worry about here, right?
>
> I hope so. Just that 11.8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Faulhammer) writes:
> David Kastrup schrieb:
>
>> Anything else?
>
> May I inform you about the Gentoo ebuild for AUCTeX which is "maintained"
> by me in the bug database http://bugs.gentoo.org/
> show_bug.cgi?id=118100>?
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hm. Reiner, could you just upload the fixed 11.82 XEmacs package to
> our download site? I don't think it would do much harm. I'll try
> to see whether the current spec file builds with the 11.82 tarball
> under Fedora,
Index: auctex/Makefile.in
diff -u auctex/Makefile.in:1.128 auctex/Makefile.in:1.129
--- auctex/Makefile.in:1.128Fri Jan 13 21:30:01 2006
+++ auctex/Makefile.in Mon Jan 16 02:56:35 2006
@@ -327,7 +327,6 @@
cd xemacs-build \
&& ./configure INSTALL_INFO=: TEXHASH=: --with-xemacs
Index: auctex/ChangeLog
diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.1278 auctex/ChangeLog:5.1279
--- auctex/ChangeLog:5.1278 Sat Jan 14 17:46:39 2006
+++ auctex/ChangeLogMon Jan 16 02:56:35 2006
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2006-01-16 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * Makefile.in (xemacs-package):
CVSROOT:/sources/auctex
Module name:auctex
Branch:
Changes by: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/01/16 02:56:35
Modified files:
. : Makefile.in ChangeLog
Log message:
(xemacs-package): Don't clean up after building so
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2006-01-15) writes:
>
>> here is what I think about coverage for the next release:
>>
>> XEmacs package: probably the most annoying issue.
>
> I don't think it is more annoying than Debian al
sms in place for that in principle, but I have not been able to
get it to work,
c) we should enable the LaTeX toolbar by default (and make it
reasonably easy to disable it). But I don't want extra files to get
loaded for people who don't use toolbars.
Anything
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> David> Too bad the package developers might be the better choice
> David> at times.
>
> I don't
Index: auctex/configure.ac
diff -u auctex/configure.ac:1.35 auctex/configure.ac:1.36
--- auctex/configure.ac:1.35Sat Dec 17 13:35:24 2005
+++ auctex/configure.ac Sat Jan 14 17:46:39 2006
@@ -121,7 +121,10 @@
AC_ARG_VAR(INSTALL_INFO, [install-info executable. Set to : to skip making a
dir f
CVSROOT:/sources/auctex
Module name:auctex
Branch:
Changes by: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/01/14 17:46:39
Modified files:
preview: configure.ac ChangeLog
. : configure.ac ChangeLog
Log message:
* config
Index: auctex/preview/configure.ac
diff -u auctex/preview/configure.ac:1.100 auctex/preview/configure.ac:1.101
--- auctex/preview/configure.ac:1.100 Sat Dec 17 13:26:18 2005
+++ auctex/preview/configure.ac Sat Jan 14 17:46:39 2006
@@ -61,8 +61,6 @@
test "X$packagelispdir" = X && packagelispdi
Index: auctex/ChangeLog
diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.1277 auctex/ChangeLog:5.1278
--- auctex/ChangeLog:5.1277 Sat Jan 14 15:30:19 2006
+++ auctex/ChangeLogSat Jan 14 17:46:39 2006
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2006-01-14 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * configure.ac: Don'
Index: auctex/preview/ChangeLog
diff -u auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.825 auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.826
--- auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.825 Fri Jan 13 22:04:14 2006
+++ auctex/preview/ChangeLogSat Jan 14 17:46:39 2006
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2006-01-14 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTEC
tend everything in the XEmacs package server policies
is beautiful. So I am not even sure he is actually doing you a favor.
And it is not a one-time job he is doing, but something that continues
to cause work in future, work taking time and effort, work that can go
wrong, and work that is actually redundant since packages are already
produced upstream.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
CVSROOT:/sources/auctex
Module name:auctex
Branch:
Changes by: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/01/13 22:04:14
Modified files:
preview: preview.el ChangeLog
Log message:
(preview-parse-messages): Some ugly fix for
`'
Index: auctex/preview/preview.el
diff -u auctex/preview/preview.el:1.262 auctex/preview/preview.el:1.263
--- auctex/preview/preview.el:1.262 Sat Sep 24 19:15:55 2005
+++ auctex/preview/preview.el Fri Jan 13 22:04:14 2006
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
;;; Commentary:
-;; $Id: preview.el,v 1.262 2005/
Index: auctex/preview/ChangeLog
diff -u auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.824 auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.825
--- auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.824 Sat Dec 31 00:14:43 2005
+++ auctex/preview/ChangeLogFri Jan 13 22:04:14 2006
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2006-01-13 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTEC
CVSROOT:/sources/auctex
Module name:auctex
Branch:
Changes by: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/01/13 21:30:01
Modified files:
. : Makefile.in ChangeLog
Log message:
(xemacs-package): Don't run `install-info' and
Index: auctex/Makefile.in
diff -u auctex/Makefile.in:1.127 auctex/Makefile.in:1.128
--- auctex/Makefile.in:1.127Wed Jan 11 16:41:39 2006
+++ auctex/Makefile.in Fri Jan 13 21:30:01 2006
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@
rm -rf xemacs-build
cp -a auctex-$(TAG) xemacs-build
cd xemacs-bu
Index: auctex/ChangeLog
diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.1274 auctex/ChangeLog:5.1275
--- auctex/ChangeLog:5.1274 Wed Jan 11 16:41:39 2006
+++ auctex/ChangeLogFri Jan 13 21:30:01 2006
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2006-01-13 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * Makefile.in (xemacs-package):
and can hope that in the future things
> will be more smooth on my side (and that the structure of auctex
> will stay the way it is at least for the near future.)
Probably more or less. We are not moving things around for the mere
fun of it: upstream also has a CVS, and moving is no
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> David> I think that in interest of coherence and of the users, we
> David> should just bite the bullet
Maybe it should, but it seems more important right now to tell people
what to do once they _have_ gotten hold of a binary package, rather
than tell them how they could generate one themselves.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
\[([0-9]+) " part would only match BOP because of the
> trailing space and the "height=(-?[0-9]+)" would match EOP.
Uh, just forget I mentioned preview-latex in that context: we don't
parse the output of dvipng. The problem is with parsing the output of
LaTeX, n
umber and depth
> and height information.
>
> A second problem that I noticed is that when a font is missing and
> mktexpk (or alike) gets called to generate it, its stdout gets intermixed
> with that of dvipng, causing a similar (but worse) confusion.
>
> Is it possible to hav
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> As far as I understand the packing system, there are two steps,
>
> - The local pkg manager, in the case of auctex, me, has to
>
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> >> No, I am not talking about the xemacs-package target I am talking
>>> >> about the without-texmfdir target,
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>David> Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> No, I am not talking about the xemacs-package target
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached you can find a patch which changes the style system in a
> way that file names with extensions are used in case of
> \documentclass, \usepackage, \include and \input macros. In
> addition options will not be put into `TeX-active-styles' on their
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>David> Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>David> diff <(tar -tz --strip-components=1 auctex-11.55.tar.gz|sort) \
t-texmf-dir option. What are the
> corresponding entries in the relevant Makefiles which
> correspond to that option?
I have no idea what you are asking here. Probably you want to take a
look at the xemacs-package target in Makefile.in. But that seems too
CVSROOT:/sources/auctex
Module name:auctex
Branch:
Changes by: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/12/31 00:14:43
Modified files:
preview: Makefile.in ChangeLog
Log message:
(ELCC, AUCTEX): Put "." in front of load-path
Index: auctex/preview/ChangeLog
diff -u auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.823 auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.824
--- auctex/preview/ChangeLog:1.823 Sat Dec 17 13:33:26 2005
+++ auctex/preview/ChangeLogSat Dec 31 00:14:43 2005
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2005-12-31 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTEC
Index: auctex/preview/Makefile.in
diff -u auctex/preview/Makefile.in:1.75 auctex/preview/Makefile.in:1.76
--- auctex/preview/Makefile.in:1.75 Fri Jun 24 08:14:05 2005
+++ auctex/preview/Makefile.in Sat Dec 31 00:14:43 2005
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
PACKAGE=preview
PACKAGE_INFO=preview-latex
[EMAIL PR
atex
> | (http://preview-latex.sourceforge.net).
> `
Fixed this.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
et seems to have the actions
for installing the elc files).
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 18 2005, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Could you elaborate what's missing WRT this in the current spec file?
>>
>> Well, I think the layout is n
Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 15 2005, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Is there any interest to have RPMs for AUCTeX 11.82? I asked twice
>>> about this and didn't get any response.
&g
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-12-15) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Then decoupling the version numbers of the preview package and
>>> AUCTeX/preview-latex might really make sense in the
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-12-15) writes:
>
>> I'd tend to mention in the release notes that there have been no
>> changes this time apart from the version number, but still go
>> through the motions.
>
> Then deco
ons at all. It
does not appear, however, like any outsider would feel compelled to do
this any better.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
o to in order to consolidate that there is no
need to update tend to cause more trouble and manual work than a
routine update would.
I'd tend to mention in the release notes that there have been no
changes this time apart from the version number, but still go through
the m
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-12-08) writes:
>
>>> l.383 dann muß in bekannter Weise $f$ um~$
>>>1$ erhöht und $e$ um~$1$
>>> ./circ.tex:383: Preview: Snippet 96 ended.(422343+
ur
texmf.cnf file (or whatever equivalent your TeX system is using) and
disable file:line: style error messages.
> Output written on circ.dvi (103 pages, 42648 bytes).
> Transcript written on circ.log.
>
> Preview-LaTeX exited as expected with code 1 at Thu Dec 8 11:55:24
> LaTeX: LaTeX found no preview images
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-12-01) writes:
>
>> ( blablabla ]
>>
>> It just outputs "Mismatched parentheses" in the echo area, and that's
>> it. The character still gets inserted.
>>
>> What do
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello
>
> I just scanned the manual, but could not find,
>
> What is the precise syntaxis to obtain the latest cvs version of
> auctex.
http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=auctex>
--
David Kastrup, Kri
I think we should not behave as rigidly as that. Instead, we should
just use the same behavior common in Emacs when you type something
like
( blablabla ]
It just outputs "Mismatched parentheses" in the echo area, and that's
it. The character still gets inserted.
What do you th
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>>
>>> Ok in that case, I prefer to wait for 11.82, since I am not keen to
>>> install a CVS version
>
>
wait for 11.82, since I am not keen to
> install a CVS version
I have to point out that this "I won't even try this out until it is
released" stance is exactly what gives us a history of releases that
fail to work or even build with XEmacs, for typically trivial reasons.
--
D
kind
of info.
It is ok if the processes are documented better in the Makefile, but I
don't think they belong in the separate docs.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
auctex. You should then have
> ~/auctex/auctex-11.81. In ~/auctex execute
> make xemacs-package FTPDIR=~/tmp TAG=11.81
> You are free to deviate from my suggestion of ~/tmp for $FTPDIR where
> the package will ultimately be put.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-11-30) writes:
>
>> And we should have simple ways to override the confusion where it is
>> hard to avoid. If people absolutely insist on being able to stick all
>> sorts of unmatched stuff into comment
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-11-30) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> * David Kastrup (2005-11-29) writes:
>>>
>>>> "`"Uberflieger"' would become pretty h
hack: $
However, I think we might be better off if the simple things work.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-11-29) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> When quote-after-quote functionality is enabled, i.e. first key press
>>> inserts ", second key press replaces
;"" and so on. The
> attached patch would make this possible.
Would appear somewhat consistent with what we do with --. However,
something like
"`"Uberflieger"' would become pretty hard to type.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-11-29) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> (texmathp-match-switch): Make aware of comments.
>>
>> I am not sure this sounds like a good idea at least
to giving such cues, the user will get more
rather than less frustrated.
We should really keep some simple syntax functional for this kind of
thing.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>David> Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> >>
>>> >> Does anybody know about that subje
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>David> Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> Does anybody know about that subject?
>
>
ters the source/page correlation, even though it would tend
to be off a bit).
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/auctex
Module name:auctex
Branch:
Changes by: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/11/25 22:25:45
Modified files:
doc: todo.texi
. : ChangeLog
Log message:
(Wishlist): Add suggestion
Index: auctex/doc/todo.texi
diff -u auctex/doc/todo.texi:1.19 auctex/doc/todo.texi:1.20
--- auctex/doc/todo.texi:1.19 Sun Sep 25 08:47:33 2005
+++ auctex/doc/todo.texiFri Nov 25 22:25:44 2005
@@ -182,6 +182,11 @@
@samp{}.
@item
+Make @AUCTeX{} work with @samp{longlines}. This would a
Index: auctex/ChangeLog
diff -u auctex/ChangeLog:5.1253 auctex/ChangeLog:5.1254
--- auctex/ChangeLog:5.1253 Thu Nov 24 16:03:36 2005
+++ auctex/ChangeLogFri Nov 25 22:25:45 2005
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2005-11-25 David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * doc/todo.texi (Wishlist
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-11-24) writes:
>
>> Uh oh. This means that we should get some testing for Emacs-21,
>> Emacs CVS, XEmacs-21.4 and probably 21.5 before daring to release
>> 11.82. Font locking is just too diverse acr
ing wild when text
> + at the end of the environment was inserted.
Uh oh. This means that we should get some testing for Emacs-21,
Emacs CVS, XEmacs-21.4 and probably 21.5 before daring to release
11.82. Font locking is just too diverse across platforms.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr.
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-11-23) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> As far as I understand the variable's doc string and intention the
>>> first item in each element is rather s
Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-11-23) writes:
>
>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Okay, in order to fix the former bug I can add a
>>> ("sty" "${TEXINPUTS}" '("
gt; ("sty" "${TEXINPUTS}" '("sty"))
> to `TeX-kpathsea-format-alist',
More likely ${TEXINPUTS.latex}.
> but I am not really feeling comfortable with this because it is a
> misuse of the variable and the interface of
> `
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>David> Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Ok, may be this is the right moment to come up with a question, I was
&g
s made a Makefile target
"xemacs-package".
Just use
make xemacs-package
then unpack the resulting XEmacs package and demolish it until it fits
the policies of the XEmacs package CVS tree.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> David> it seems pointless to go out of one's way to promote a
> David> product which makes a point of m
keywords. Instead of
trying to fix up the problems with the old 11.55, it would seem to
make more sense to sync with upstream.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
___
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
built binary packages from the official
AUCTeX site (complete targets for that are in the Makefile), but on
the other hand it seems pointless to go out of one's way to promote a
product which makes a point of making cooperation difficult.
If XEmacs central prefers a modus of operation which tend
Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>David> The GPL states
>
>David> 2b) You must cause any work that you distribute or
>David> publish, that in
no charge to all third
parties under the terms of this License.
This would concern the whole of wikipedia-mode.el including your
enhancements. That's the work "in whole". If the rest of
wikipedia-mode.el is not releasable under the GPL (by whoever), then
forming a combined wo
pedia.el is to be released under the GPL, you have all the
permission that can be secured at the moment. Whether this is enough
for you, is your decision. Releasing under other licenses would be
hard to do, given that the FSF is pretty much the main copyright
holder of AUCTeX by now.
--
David Kas
701 - 800 of 1486 matches
Mail list logo
