Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * David Kastrup (2006-01-16) writes: > >> More specifically: I have just handed in abstracts for the >> Chemnitzer Linuxtage (a seriously great conference I've been >> visiting for years on end) and the Dante-Tagung in Berlin, both at >> the beginning of March. > > Then we should try to get some features done before that. Currently > there haven't been enough changes to warrant a new release. I am > thinking about the style system changes
Fine with me, but we'll probably need to iron out a few things. Backward compatibility, preferably. > and the functionality for accessing TeX-related documentation. > > By the way, yesterday I had the idea to use the information from the > parser to find the LaTeX package a certain command belongs to and > use that to open the corresponding documentation. Not as good as a > real command database with included documentation, but helpful > anyway. But the parsed information is only available once all style files have been loaded. I don't think we'll get around saving this information separately. Once we do, it would make sense to load it when C-c RET or C-c C-e are used to enter an unknown command/environment, check whether it is in the database, and offer to place the respective \usepackage into the preamble. >> I also had to update my father's RedHat box for PDF creation and it >> was somewhat embarrassing that 11.55+0.9.1 was the newest usable >> stuff available. 11.81 without preview-latex would have been >> simply unacceptable. And I did not want to mess with /usr/local >> for now. > > Maybe use checkinstall? If I am going to start a mess, I might as well do it not just for him. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
