Arash Esbati [2024-04-18 19:37 +0200] wrote:
> Also my apologies to Basil for receiving all these messages, but it
> should be done now :-)
Definitely no need to apologise!
(I was already subscribed to auctex-devel.)
I'm sorry for not having followed the thread; I'll catch up soon™ :).
Thanks
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> I think most Latexmk users have their own .latexmkrc because the stock
> Latexmk just runs latex enough times and generate .dvi file. (no pdflatex
> and no .pdf output) So I guess they are accustomed to have full control
> over the options with their .latexmkrc.
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> This doesn't feel right. AUCTeX has some options to control the output,
> and I think we should support them. I mean, the only issue is currently
> with dvipdfmx as discussed above, and I don't think we should throw the
> baby out with the bathwater
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> I think we can omit "-recorder" option. It seems that Latexmk adds
> "-recorder" option to latex command by default. The reason why I put
> "-recorder-" in my proposal was to suppress that option; when %l
> expansion includes "\input", Latexmk puts "-recorder"
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> This is my next approximation:
> diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el
> index c4e4104e..a0649c73 100644
> --- a/tex.el
> +++ b/tex.el
> @@ -250,6 +250,9 @@ If nil, none is specified."
> ("Ps2pdf" "ps2pdf %f %(O?pdf)" TeX-run-ps2pdf nil
> (plain-TeX-mode
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> This isn't quite correct because this clause covers cases for Japanese
> LaTeX engines (`TeX-engine' being ptex or uptex※) as well.
>
> ※ `jtex' engine became obsolete and isn't maintained anymore as far as
> I know.
Thanks for your comments. Yes, I ignored
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> So lets call it a preliminary solution ;-) I plan to install this
> change as a starter:
[...]
> + ;; This is essentially (eq TeX-engine 'default) since we
> + ;; ignore 'omega completely:
This isn't quite correct because this
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> I realized that %l played an important role for Japanese LaTeX document,
> too; it gave latex binary name such as "platex" as well as its
> supplementary option such as "-kanji=xxx".
> However, I haven't come up with a good solution which is compatible for
> both
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
>> AUCTeX users can deginate latex binary file names through
>> `TeX-engine-alist' and `LaTeX-command', which can be different from
>> standard "latex", "xelatex" and "lualatex". If we are to support such
>> non-standard binary names, we need %l. (However,
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> It would need to write a new sentinel for latexmk if we are going to
> provide the most suitable candidate in all cases.
And I was hoping we can avoid that :-|
> AUCTeX users can deginate latex binary file names through
> `TeX-engine-alist' and `LaTeX-command',
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
>> 2. After C-c C-c LaTeXMK, in dvi+dvips case, C-c C-c View offers xdvi,
>> not postscript viewer, as default candidate. Similarly, in
>> dvi+dvipdfmx case, C-c C-c offers Dvipdfmx, not View, as default
>> candidate.
> Yes, I can confirm this. I also tried
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> I expect the attached patch basically works.
Thanks for picking this up as well.
> It still has shortcomings:
> 1. It uses single quote to prevent variable expansion of '$dvipdf' in
> the shell command line. However, it doesn't work for windows.
Yes, that
> Ikumi Keita writes:
> Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
>> I knew you would understand me ;-) Can you do me a favor please and have
>> a look at the code I posted? I'm not sure how (XeLaTeX/)Dvipdfmx works
>> in .dvi mode, I think you have more experience in that area. I'd
>>
> Arash Esbati writes:
> Colin Baxter writes:
>> What is being proposed?
> See my other message to this thread.
>> This already works
>>
>> (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook (lambda() (add-to-list
>> 'TeX-command-list '("LaTeXMK" "latexmk %s" TeX-run-TeX nil t
>>
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> I knew you would understand me ;-) Can you do me a favor please and have
> a look at the code I posted? I'm not sure how (XeLaTeX/)Dvipdfmx works
> in .dvi mode, I think you have more experience in that area. I'd
> appreciate if you can give a me hint
Hi Keita,
Ikumi Keita writes:
> I'm fine with your idea. AUCTeX already has plenty of supplementary
> entries in `TeX-command-list', so it would be good to have another one
> :-)
I knew you would understand me ;-) Can you do me a favor please and have
a look at the code I posted? I'm not sure
Colin Baxter writes:
> What is being proposed?
See my other message to this thread.
> This already works
>
> (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook
> (lambda()
> (add-to-list
> 'TeX-command-list
> '("LaTeXMK" "latexmk %s" TeX-run-TeX nil t
>
Hi Basil,
"Basil L. Contovounesios" writes:
> Arash Esbati [2024-03-28 13:09 +0100] wrote:
>
> Indeed, with the exception of important bugs which can be fixed at
> https://github.com/emacsmirror/auctex-latexmk (this is the fork/mirror
> that MELPA serves).
Thanks for your response and the
Hi Arash,
Thanks for your kind message.
Arash Esbati [2024-03-28 13:09 +0100] wrote:
> I was looking through our old bugs and I saw bug#48144[1] which was
> about LatexMK and the issue is resolved. Looking at auctex-latexmk
> package[2], it seems dormant.
Indeed, with the exception of
> Ikumi Keita writes:
> Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
>> Hi all, I was looking through our old bugs and I saw bug#48144[1]
>> which was about LatexMK and the issue is resolved. Looking at
>> auctex-latexmk package[2], it seems dormant. Acc. to this
>>
Hi Arash,
> Arash Esbati writes:
> Hi all,
> I was looking through our old bugs and I saw bug#48144[1] which was
> about LatexMK and the issue is resolved. Looking at auctex-latexmk
> package[2], it seems dormant. Acc. to this message[3], the fix in
> #48144 was helpful and adding LatexMK
Hi all,
I was looking through our old bugs and I saw bug#48144[1] which was
about LatexMK and the issue is resolved. Looking at auctex-latexmk
package[2], it seems dormant. Acc. to this message[3], the fix in
#48144 was helpful and adding LatexMK support to AUCTeX isn't hard. I
don't use
22 matches
Mail list logo
