Re: [AUCTeX] minor issue of fontification if \begin{verbatim}foo
David Kastrup writes: Hi David, >>> Sorry for the delay. I confirm the commit fixes it, but my test file >>> also had >>> >>> \begin{verbatim}X\end{verbatim} >>> >>> and this confuses the fontifying. >> >> Argh, you are a hard opponent. But I think my latest commit fixes >> this, too, namely I don't require that the \end{env} is on its own >> line with at most whitespace in front of it anymore. I hope it >> doesn't have any negative consequences, though. Well, and if it has, >> I guess _you_ will tell me. :-) > > You'll probably want to see how verbatim.dtx behaves when describing > verbatim-like environments... Could you give me a pointer to what you are exactly referring to? Reading through verbatim.dtx I thought you might be referring to that in \begin{verbatim}test test\end{verbatim}more text the "more text" is lost with \usepackage{verbatim} (but not without it). But well, the contents are allowed to be just after the \begin and just before the \end. So that's probably not what you mean... Bye, Tassilo ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] minor issue of fontification if \begin{verbatim}foo
Tassilo Horn writes: > jfbu writes: > > Hi Jean-Francois, > >>> Good catch. I've pushed a fix just now. Let me know if it works (or >>> exhibits problems in other situations). >> >> Sorry for the delay. I confirm the commit fixes it, but my test file >> also had >> >> \begin{verbatim}X\end{verbatim} >> >> and this confuses the fontifying. > > Argh, you are a hard opponent. But I think my latest commit fixes this, > too, namely I don't require that the \end{env} is on its own line with > at most whitespace in front of it anymore. I hope it doesn't have any > negative consequences, though. Well, and if it has, I guess _you_ will > tell me. :-) You'll probably want to see how verbatim.dtx behaves when describing verbatim-like environments... -- David Kastrup ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] minor issue of fontification if \begin{verbatim}foo
Le 18 sept. 2016 à 19:33, Tassilo Horn a écrit : > jfbu writes: > > Hi Jean-Francois, > >>> Good catch. I've pushed a fix just now. Let me know if it works (or >>> exhibits problems in other situations). >> >> Sorry for the delay. I confirm the commit fixes it, but my test file >> also had >> >> \begin{verbatim}X\end{verbatim} >> >> and this confuses the fontifying. > > Argh, you are a hard opponent. But I think my latest commit fixes this, > too, namely I don't require that the \end{env} is on its own line with > at most whitespace in front of it anymore. I hope it doesn't have any > negative consequences, though. Well, and if it has, I guess _you_ will > tell me. :-) Good work ! not seen negative consequences so far ... > >> You said to exhibit problems ! ;-) > > Keep it going, I'm at the top of the font-latex game! ;-) I have been thinking about putting now the \end{verbatim} _before_ the \begin{verbatim} but you are a lucky guy as LaTeX does not like that ;-) By the way, could there be a way to have a fontifying like in verbatim but at the same time not have restriction on what one can do with fill-paragraph etc.., i.e. it could reflow like standard LaTeX code is allowed too ? Indeed I have a context where I have an environment where I write LaTeX code which gets executed and also verbatim-printed. So far I turned off verbatim fontification for this environment, but it would be nice to have it nevertheless distinguished form the rest of the code (don't know if this is clear) Best, Jean-Francois > > Bye, > Tassilo ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] minor issue of fontification if \begin{verbatim}foo
jfbu writes: Hi Jean-Francois, >> Good catch. I've pushed a fix just now. Let me know if it works (or >> exhibits problems in other situations). > > Sorry for the delay. I confirm the commit fixes it, but my test file > also had > > \begin{verbatim}X\end{verbatim} > > and this confuses the fontifying. Argh, you are a hard opponent. But I think my latest commit fixes this, too, namely I don't require that the \end{env} is on its own line with at most whitespace in front of it anymore. I hope it doesn't have any negative consequences, though. Well, and if it has, I guess _you_ will tell me. :-) > You said to exhibit problems ! ;-) Keep it going, I'm at the top of the font-latex game! ;-) Bye, Tassilo ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] minor issue of fontification if \begin{verbatim}foo
Le 18 sept. 2016 à 17:07, Tassilo Horn a écrit : > jfbu writes: > > Hi Jean-Francois, > >> A >> \begin{verbatim}foo >> bar >> \end{verbatim} >> B >> etc... >> \end{document} >> >> seems to fontify the whole buffer from that point on as >> if entirely inside the verbatim. >> >> Surely a minor issue as it is not usual (but not forbidden either) to >> put something immediately after the \begin{verbatim} > > Good catch. I've pushed a fix just now. Let me know if it works (or > exhibits problems in other situations). > > Bye, > Tassilo Hi Tassilo, Sorry for the delay. I confirm the commit fixes it, but my test file also had \begin{verbatim}X\end{verbatim} and this confuses the fontifying. You said to exhibit problems ! ;-) Thanks, Jean-Francois ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] minor issue of fontification if \begin{verbatim}foo
jfbu writes: Hi Jean-Francois, > A > \begin{verbatim}foo > bar > \end{verbatim} > B > etc... > \end{document} > > seems to fontify the whole buffer from that point on as > if entirely inside the verbatim. > > Surely a minor issue as it is not usual (but not forbidden either) to > put something immediately after the \begin{verbatim} Good catch. I've pushed a fix just now. Let me know if it works (or exhibits problems in other situations). Bye, Tassilo ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex