Hello, Martin,
I will continue to discuss here, as this is the translation list.
You can still make the language pack an open-source package and only
close-source the code of the software itself (if authors of the code are
willing to give you that permission).
Lp, m.
V V sre., 2. jun. 2021 ob
Hi all,
Apologies for not responding to the initial emails sooner and for the
length of my response.
I was asked by Muse to work on Audacity due to my experience working with
the community on MuseScore. One of my main functions on that project (and
now this project) is organising an 'internal'
I will also request that my contribution be withdrawn if the GPL licence is
not maintained for "the whole" project.
O mér., 2 de xuño de 2021 ás 11:06, Cleber Tavano ()
escribiu:
> Martin, hello there
>
> That's the main point here, they want us to sign an agreement so they can
> change the
Martin, hello there
That's the main point here, they want us to sign an agreement so they can
change the license used at that time (gpl2+) to anything they want,
including any open or closed-source licenses.
Em qua, 2 de jun de 2021 06:00, Martin Srebotnjak
escreveu:
> Our work is released
Our work is released under the license as Audacity at the time of our
contributions.
Muse must comply with that.
They just need to change this sentence.
No problem.
Lp, m.
V V sre., 2. jun. 2021 ob 10:44 je oseba Joachim Huffer <
joachim.huf...@gmail.com> napisala:
> Well, as I understand it,
Hey Thomas,
I admire you very much but I beg to differ... Basically we're giving the
right for a private company to do whatever they see fit with our hard
labor, including using it in a paid software or sell our contributions to
any company or service that they want to, under any license.
Well, as I understand it, if I sign this CLA, I basically give Muse the
right to do whatever it wants with my translation:
- You grant MUSECY SM LTD, an affiliate of MuseScore and Ultimate
Guitar, (“Company”) the ability to use the Contributions in any way. You
hereby grant to Company ,
Hi
Is it really that big of a deal? The way I understand, it's only to prevent any
legal issues in the future, no?
[...] This license is not only for the protection of the contributors
themselves, but also for the protection of the project and its users; it does
not change your rights to use
If this is how it is counted ... I completely agree.
2 de junio de 2021 10:15, "Luca Alzetta" mailto:lucalze...@gmail.com?to=%22Luca%20Alzetta%22%20)>
escribió:
I agree too.
Il mer 2 giu 2021, 08:10 Cleber Tavano mailto:clebertav...@gmail.com)> ha scritto: Hello everybody,Again, I learned
from
I agree too.
Il mer 2 giu 2021, 08:10 Cleber Tavano ha scritto:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Again, I learned from the press that Audacity is changing everything in
> licensing and "forgot" to let us know why or what they're doing.
> Now we're asked to give in all our contributions under a murky and
Helo,
I totally agree with you. Let's fork.
Lp, m.
V V sre., 2. jun. 2021 ob 08:10 je oseba Cleber Tavano <
clebertav...@gmail.com> napisala:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Again, I learned from the press that Audacity is changing everything in
> licensing and "forgot" to let us know why or what
Hello everybody,
Again, I learned from the press that Audacity is changing everything in
licensing and "forgot" to let us know why or what they're doing.
Now we're asked to give in all our contributions under a murky and
uncertainly-worded license agreement that will grant Muse the right to do
12 matches
Mail list logo
