Re: web browser games: interesting or boaring?
Funnily enough shut eye Im exactly the oposite. Id love to play a single player civ or exploration stratogy game, but I have no interest in building something just for it to be destroyed by another player, but as I said this is why there isnt
Re: web browser games: interesting or boaring?
Well, I for one generally enjoy browser based games. They tend to be fairly in depth as far as a storyline goes, and they are cross-platform making them ideal for someone who doesnt necessarily use Windows all the time.In particular I have played
Re: web browser games: interesting or boaring?
Well really it depends upon the game and the player, different games have different strengths. Puppet nightmares has a great combat system, core exiles has very complex trading missions and economics, kingdom of loathing has the humour,
Re: web browser games: interesting or boaring?
I cant stand RP or action browser games, but the strategic civilization style ones rock my world. (OGame before they rewrote the codebase 4 years ago, Tracers which will be dead soon due to lack of interest, tribal wars, dark galaxy, etc)URL:
web browser games: interesting or boaring?
hi.this is a question: the web browser games are boaring, or interesting?they like grail to the tief the prototype version, or something els?kamochek.URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=172946#p172946
Re: web browser games: interesting or boaring?
I think webbrowser games are all boring, the content doesnt matter. I like gamebooks thoughURL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=172953#p172953
___
Audiogames-reflector mailing list
Re: web browser games: interesting or boaring?
I personally found browser games not very interesting. Most really boiled down to going somewhere and killing someone - click this link to go to this dungeon, then click that link, keep clicking it until the monster dies, maybe check something
