Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-21 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : arqmeister via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order I would promptly hop over to linux if orca was actually a worthy screen-reader. Oh, folks on the orca list could give me a laundry list of oppinions on why there is nothing wrong with orca, and it will get the job done, but i strongly beg to differ. I

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-21 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : afrim via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order @Kei_jones,I don’t know which edition of windows you are using, but NVDA reads Task manager without any issue. All you should do is installing NVDA and not keep it portable. It works just fine on windows 8.1. Then I’m not sure which service should I

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-21 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : coltonhill01 via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order here's the thing. I will only use windows. I will occasionally use OSX, in a vm now because I'm not buying a mac, because I can't and I won't. I don't like it. But OSX is a business platform. It is designed to be used in the office, there are litterally

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-21 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : wanderer via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order I agree with everything said here about Windows; it's bloated, messy and a pain in the ass to get configured. That being said, I used to have 8.1 and 10 running on an old single-core 1.86 x86 laptop, 1.5 gb of RAM (no paging file) and a slow 80 GB SATA HD

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-21 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : Shinobi via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order Personally,   I really don't care.  I am not harming anyone with what I do on my computer, and because of that,  I really don't care.  If I get potted by Microsoft,  that's okay, I have been to their offices and I know some people so I should be fine.At

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-21 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : Chris via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order What exactly is all this data collection stuff about? The major! reason Windows pisses me off so much is that the installer doesn't talk. I really really don't understand this. I thought it would change with Windows 10, but I doubt it. Hell, the only

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-21 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : Sebby via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order I did really like XP. Sure, Classic Shell is half the battle, but modern Windows is still a very large sprawling mess. I mean look at the list in services.msc and Task Scheduler. It's appalling!Yes, it's modern. I do appreciate that. But XP works

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-21 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : Sebby via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order I did really like XP. Sure, Classic Shell is half the battle, but modern Windows is still a very large sprawling mess. I mean look at the list in services.msc and Task Scheduler. It's appalling!Yes, it's modern. I do appreciate that. But XP works

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-21 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : Chris via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order What exactly is all this data collection stuff about? The major! reason Windows pisses me off so much is that the installer doesn't talk. I really really don't understand this. I thought it would change with Windows 10, but I doubt it. Hell, the only

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-21 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : Chris via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order What exactly is all this data collection stuff about? The major! reason Windows pisses me off so much is that the installer doesn't talk. I really really don't understand this. I thought it would change with Windows 10, but I doubt it. Hell, the only

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-20 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : CAE_Jones via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order Mostly, the reason they are still expected to support XP is because XP is the last version of Windows that was actually good (at least in the first year and a half before the inevitable security vulnerabilities catch up with you).I understand the need

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-20 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : Sebby via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order Mmm, dunno. For all that MS don't want it to be the case, the truth is that their whole success is predicated on back-compatibility. And yeah, lazy they may be, but isn't it the right of the people to choose? Remember, we've been through worse

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-20 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : wanderer via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order I actually understand why newer processors won't be supported on earlier versions; MS is trying to avoid what happened with XP. There's already a huge and ridiculously complex infrastructure in Windows for maintaining compatibility with older applications

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-20 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : afrim via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order LOL, I love so much the title of this topic.I'm on windows 8.1, and I don't know for what reason would I upgrade to win 10. Cortana and Microsoft edge cannot persuade me to go. Maybe I can install it in the summer, but I'm very lazy to get my stuff back

Re: The Windows 10 New World Order

2016-01-20 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : Sebby via Audiogames-reflector
Re: The Windows 10 New World Order Windows 8.1 plus Classic Shell works just fine for me too. No need of an upgrade, and no wish for it either. And yeah, Win7 was somewhat crappy, really; it's only that it was marginally better than Vista that people took to it at all, and to be honest

<    1   2   3