Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-14 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : magurp244 via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality @defenderI've known people who've never had any problems with wireless keyboards and mice, but then again i've also had ones that were jittery or flaky with their connections. Maybe its particular brands or just personal preference, I tend

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-13 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : CAE_Jones via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality I would be all for the Some Assembly Required display! I'd have to think more on the customization. It could be a way to keep prices low while allowing people to upgrade over time, or something like that. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-12 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : defender via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality I totally forgot about the Pie... LOLThough I was under the impression that wireless mice and keyboards were quite reliable nowadays...I also forgot to mention cursor routing buttons.If the display is small enough for most people to read

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-12 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : defender via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality I totally forgot about the Pie... LOLThough I was under the impression that wireless mice and keyboards were quite reliable now a days...If it would truly bring the cost down than I guess I'd be fine with assembling it, but I don't think

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-12 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : defender via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality I totally forgot about the Pie... LOLThough I was under the impression that wireless mice and keyboards were quite reliable now a days...If it would truly bring the cost down than I guess I'd be fine with assembling it, but I don't think

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-12 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : magurp244 via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality Thanks everyone for taking the time to share your thoughts on this, it's proving to be quite informative, heh.Wireless systems tend to be unreliable in general, its hard to say if its usually a result of the transmitter being too weak or too

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-12 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : magurp244 via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality Thanks everyone for taking the time to share your thoughts on this, it's proving to be quite informative, heh.Wireless systems tend to be unreliable in general, its hard to say if its usually a result of the transmitter being too weak or too

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-12 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : magurp244 via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality Thanks everyone for taking the time to share your thoughts on this, it's proving to be quite informative, heh.Wireless systems tend to be unreliable in general, its hard to say if its usually a result of the transmitter being too weak or too

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-11 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : defender via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality The 32 cell displays on allot of notetakers usually didn't feel too cramped for me, but I'd imagine that a 20 would.40 is more ideal though.IMO (slow) autorefresh is agonizing, and takes away much of the usefulness of a braille display.I

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-11 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : defender via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality The 32 cell displays on allot of note takers usually didn't feel too cramped for me, but I'd imagine that 20 would.40 is more ideal though.IMO, slow auto refresh is agonizing, and takes away much of the usefulness of a braille display.I

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-11 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : defender via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality The 32 cell displays on allot of note takers never felt too cramped for me, but I'd imagine that 20 would.So somewhere around their would be good, maybe 28 would be fine.IMO, slow auto refresh is agonizing, and takes away much

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-11 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : Angel via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality Nothing much, I can stay with 18 cels or less if needed, but I need a kiap display who can take notes and use it with the computer or my phone to be faster in reading.Refreshing rate is nothing for me, cause I can refresh it and I want

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-10 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : magurp244 via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality Hm, interesting value proposition, it's seems a tricky subject considering individuals different needs, heh. I guess there would be a lower threshold for refresh rate, if only from an effective usability standpoint in term's of navigating

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-10 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : magurp244 via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality Hm, interesting value proposition, it's seems a tricky subject considering individuals different needs, heh. I guess there would be a lower threshold for refresh rate, if only from an effective usability standpoint in term's of navigating

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-10 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : magurp244 via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality Hm, interesting value proposition, it's seems a tricky subject considering individuals different needs, heh. I guess there would be a lower threshold for refresh rate, if only from an effective usability standpoint in term's of navigating

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-09 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : CAE_Jones via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality The Orbit Reader is supposed to be a $500 display with 20 cells. That's bargain enough that I'd consider it if the thing would ever come out. But that's primarily because it is the only halfway affordable option in general.I was honestly

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-09 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : magurp244 via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality Hm, manual and automatic refresh, yes thats something else to think about. Do you consider 40 cells to be a relatively good average size? If the display were cheaper, like 300$, 200$, or less, would you be more inclined to get one? Maybe

Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-09 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : BigGun via Audiogames-reflector
Re: Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality Personally if there is a brail display with 40 cels and just some other extra buttons for moving but no wheels or jumping or whatnot and costs from 400 to 1000 dollars would be fine, though I cant say that I would still buy it because I have

Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality

2017-12-08 Thread AudioGames . net Forum — Off-topic room : magurp244 via Audiogames-reflector
Affordable Braille Displays: Cost vs Quality There are quite a few braille displays lately, the Canute, Graphiti, Orbit Reader 20, etc. that are coming on the market at more "affordable" prices, generally from 400$ to 800$ or more. While its an improvement, for that price I