atrocity wrote:
I'm not sure why people feel the need to answer this question with I
don't like it though I suppose I'm just as guilty for whining about
that.
I believe that in my previous post (#10 above) I outlined why I don't
think that multi-channel audio (and to a lesser extent, video)
atrocity wrote:
And that's fine, you don't have to like multichannel music (or anything
else, for that matter). But when someone asks How can I..? it seems
pointless to respond with a version of Who cares? To me, it's no
different from responding to I have one Beethoven FLAC that won't
I've got a dedicated computer in the living room that I turn on when I
want to play multichannel DVD-A rips. Since I'm running Windows, I also
have to keep the monitor on. Definitely not optimal, but I have yet to
hear of any other way to do it that works as reliably.
As for encapsulating DTS
ralphpnj wrote:
I believe that in my previous post (#10 above) I outlined why I don't
think that multi-channel audio (and to a lesser extent, video) is at the
present time basically useless.
And that's fine, you don't have to like multichannel music (or anything
else, for that matter). But
ralphpnj wrote:
Look I'm not trying to start some kind of flame war but I really, really
think that you should actually read my entire post before you reply.
It was not and is not my intent to single you out. I'm simply
expressing consternation that a relatively straightforward question
Archimago wrote:
Hi guys, wondering how you all are running multichannel rigs and what
format you're enjoying?
Like others have expressed, I also wish there were some way to integrate
multichannel into the Squeezebox system. Awhile back I remember that if
I tried to play a 5.1 song
Hi All, I am looking to take my home system up a notch and I am seeking
opinions. My system currently runs very smooth and consists of:
An older Dell PowerEdge Server running Windows 8.1 Pro, a 2.53 GHz
Celeron, and 2.00 GB of ram.
A Netgear R7000 with the 2.4 GHz band dedicated to the home
atrocity wrote:
It was not and is not my intent to single you out. I'm simply
expressing consternation that a relatively straightforward question
already has no fewer than four variations on What you want is
pointless. If I appear to be picking on you, I apologize.
The subject is
i think it is quite natural that in a forum like this a subtopic
develops out of a topic like this. it'd be extremely quiet if that
wasn't the usual modus operandi. :-)
one thing i am pretty sure about: there was never any intent of flaming.
it's been a long time since i have seen on of
Getting multichannel done right can be a bit of a challenge of
course and for practical reasons, will not be for everyone including
soundroom setup, WAF, increased cost, etc... I just wish it was easier
without all these bits and pieces I've had to cobble together!
well getting stereo right is
Even if Radio is not as good source component as the Touch .
The biggest difference will still be the speakers . If you can hear the
difference between the speakers , you can hear it with a Radio too . In
general the difference between speakers are much bigger than between
digital players .
Archimago wrote:
I'm looking forward to another Roger Waters favourite - Amused To
Death coming out in discreet multichannel
Me too!
To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will
get.amped wrote:
My multi-channel system is (almost) completely separate from my SB-based
two channel stereo. Which means there are a lot of speakers in my living
room. And since there's no W, WAF is not a factor.
I rip DVD, BR and DVD-A discs to ISO images and store them on the same
13 matches
Mail list logo
