Archimago wrote:
On that note, I published the Intercontinental Test thanks to Mnyb.
:-)
http://archimago.blogspot.com/2015/02/measurements-intercontinental-internet.html
Enjoy...
Such a splendid showcase! If this doesn't eradicate audiophoolia,
nothing will! (And my money is on the
Archimago wrote:
On that note, I published the Intercontinental Test thanks to Mnyb.
:-)
http://archimago.blogspot.com/2015/02/measurements-intercontinental-internet.html
Enjoy...
Good stuff. It would have been interesting to do a traceroute to see
how many routers the data was
Shocking!
Now think one minute that there seriously are people out there that
claim audible improvements when doing audiophile registry tweaks on
Mnybs PC :)
Wombat's Profile:
Now it seems that even The New York Times wants to get in on that
quantum mechanics thing:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/opinion/sunday/the-reality-of-quantum-weirdness.html?action=clickpgtype=Homepageversion=Moth-Hiddenmodule=inside-nyt-regionregion=inside-nyt-regionWT.nav=inside-nyt-region
Gandhi wrote:
Such a splendid showcase! If this doesn't eradicate audiophoolia,
nothing will! (And my money is on the latter...)
Unfortunately I have already come across audiophiles arguing that the
demonstration is pointless, as the intermediate digital steps don't
matter - the point of the
Julf wrote:
Unfortunately I have already come across audiophiles arguing that the
demonstration is pointless, as the intermediate digital steps don't
matter - the point of the Very Expensive Audiophool Ethernet Cable is to
isolate your music streamer from the nasty noise in computers (and I
mikerob wrote:
Good stuff. It would have been interesting to do a traceroute to see
how many routers the data was going through in its journey between
Sweden and Canada.
If you read the New York Times I linked to above you will realize that
the data may or may not have passed through all
paulster wrote:
Nice job... as always.
I've been at a loss this last few years to understand whether these
'high-end' cable companies offering their special digital cables truly
believe that they are somehow better, or whether they know they make no
difference but that they have a market
netchord wrote:
is '$8.98 super expensive?'
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GK5UI06/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o04_s00?ie=UTF8psc=1)
i recently switched from transporter connected wirelessly, to wired w/
the above cable to an Airport Extreme, which in turn connects wirelessly
to another
Mnyb wrote:
one should insert an extra switch and a short piece of this super
expensive cable .
is '$8.98 super expensive?'
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GK5UI06/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o04_s00?ie=UTF8psc=1)
i recently switched from transporter connected wirelessly, to wired w/
the
Wombat wrote:
According to your sig you use the Transporter as transport only but hear
better dynamics over ethernet against wireless?
old sig- can't figure out how to change it.
--
4 TB Drobo--FW 800--mac mini--Ethernet
Transporter-- Wireworld Eclipse 6 coax--Meridian G61
G61-- Nordost
netchord wrote:
is '$8.98 super expensive?'
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GK5UI06/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o04_s00?ie=UTF8psc=1)
i recently switched from transporter connected wirelessly, to wired w/
the above cable to an Airport Extreme, which in turn connects wirelessly
to another
philippe_44 wrote:
Quick question: you've lost me here ... I fully agree with you wrt the
insanities I'm reading like this NAS or this hardrive is giving a much
deeper sound - this is laughable, but intermediate steps do not matter,
they really don't. Your signal can come from Mars, being
Mnyb wrote:
It is a slight possibility to inject noise at the last leg , but as
Archimagos measurment shows it does not actually happen in practice with
normal equipment he uses rather crummy switches etc to hammer in the
piont . And if the player has some of the shelf recovering circuit it
Julf wrote:
Unfortunately I have already come across audiophiles arguing that the
demonstration is pointless, as the intermediate digital steps don't
matter - the point of the Very Expensive Audiophool Ethernet Cable is to
isolate your music streamer from the nasty noise in computers (and I
Sorry for rambling , some cables do for example provide silver
conductors which in this aplication makes no difference what so ever .
So some high ends mods are not harmful they just do nothing at all .
Main hifi: Touch + CIA
Julf wrote:
Unfortunately I have already come across audiophiles arguing that the
demonstration is pointless, as the intermediate digital steps don't
matter - the point of the Very Expensive Audiophool Ethernet Cable is to
isolate your music streamer from the nasty noise in computers (and I
17 matches
Mail list logo
