utgg wrote:
Agree it is almost certainly a player memory size limitation - the
database is probably held in ram. Plus the use of 16-bit track
references.
It's instructive to have a feel for how much memory you actually need. I
would have thought 100 bytes average for per-track tag
probedb wrote:
100 bytes is nothing though and if the tags are unicode then you just
halved that. 50 characters wouldn't cover the song title + artist for
many of the bands I listen to.
I did say well organised. And I still maintain 100 is reasonable as an
average - for all those long titles
Archimago, you should know better that you will not succeed with your
business if you try to undercut the competition. You have to sell with a
higher price!
reinholdk's Profile:
garym wrote:
Unfortunately, these turn in to mud slinging contests (and be prepared
to be told that if you say you need more than 65,000 tracks you're
either lying or crazy).
Or a file sharer who doesn't pay for his music ;)
utgg wrote:
I did say well organised. And I still maintain 100 is reasonable as an
average - for all those long titles there will plenty of short ones as
well.
100 bytes is ridiculously small. For search, you need to store artist,
album artist, composer, track name, album name, genre, release
reinholdk wrote:
Archimago, you should know better that you will not succeed with your
business if you try to undercut the competition. You have to sell with a
higher price!
Yes that's the weird economy for luxury items for the rich .
You sell more if you hike the price ! Porsche did that
Mnyb wrote:
Yes that's the weird economy for luxury items for the rich .
You sell more if you hike the price ! Porsche did that mistakes in the
80's and early 90's was it not some model that was relatively
affordable so that just maybe a working class hero could get one if he
worked hard
poing wrote:
Or a file sharer who doesn't pay for his music ;)
... thats the OCD people here with 45 tracks , you cant possible
listen to that even if you did not have a day job and did it for 10
hours a day . and then only listen once :D
65k is quite possible given that your now in your
Reminds me on some garbage i once wrote.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-based/202369-hand-made-sata-cable-cat-5.html#post2824871
NO joke, i got PMs for that asking for more details because others hear
the same!
Transporter (modded) - RG142 - Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks -
Archimago wrote:
Okay. Fine. I have seen the light!
$12,500.01 it is.
Not a penny less! And to optimize the performance of this server
machine, it'll have a 8GB vintage 10-year-old flash drive (because those
were the quietest drives of course!). 2X DVD burner circa 2001 approved
by
Wombat wrote:
Reminds me on some garbage i once wrote.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-based/202369-hand-made-sata-cable-cat-5.html#post2824871
NO joke, i got PMs for that asking for more details because others hear
the same!
Lol! That's funny.
Archimago wrote:
Clearly: The. Ultimate. Serving. Machine.
And this is the name of your business: T.U.S.M.
(I agree to receive $1,000 per sold unit from you.)
reinholdk's Profile:
12 matches
Mail list logo
