SBGK wrote:
> so what will you say when manufacturers start making their dacs with
> regen type devices already included and people prefer the sq of those to
> previous versions ? will that also be some form of mass delusion ?
I will do what everybody should do all the time, and what you should
Archimago wrote:
> What, USB DACs with a USB hub chip in front of the on-board
> microcontroller to "reclock" or "regenerate" or whatever?
>
We already went through one stage of gratuitous reclocking with the
advent of Asynch DACs, and look where that got us - a perceived need for
another
Archimago wrote:
> Julf. You should know better than to drink and type on an audiophile
> forum. :-)
I agree with not drinking and typing, but how can you *read* an
audiophile forum and not drink?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of
SBGK wrote:
> so what will you say when manufacturers start making their dacs with
> regen type devices already included and people prefer the sq of those to
> previous versions ? will that also be some form of mass delusion ?
See below:
Archimago wrote:
> What, USB DACs with a USB hub chip
ralphpnj wrote:
> What they said.
Well, except... My point was that true audiophiles tend to declare
asynchronous sample rate converters Truly Evil - probably because they
make the whole jitter discussion a non-issue, and in a simple way, so
that can't be good.
The answer to by SBGK's
arnyk wrote:
> We already went through one stage of gratuitous reclocking with the
> advent of Asynch DACs, and look where that got us - a perceived need for
> another stage of reclocking!
>
> I have no doubt that given the low cost of parts to implement, and the
> almost universal gullibility
Julf wrote:
> Well, except... My point was that true audiophiles tend to declare
> asynchronous sample rate converters Truly Evil - probably because they
> make the whole jitter discussion a non-issue, and in a simple way, so
> that can't be good.
>
> The answer to by SBGK's question (that no
SBGK wrote:
> why would they do that if the dac was immune to any gremlins fed to it ?
Because they are bullied into such wasteful purchases by unscrupulous
audio manufacturers, dealers and other audiophiles.
The audiophile culture has created a population of people who crave
influence and
Julf wrote:
> Well, except... My point was that true audiophiles tend to declare
> asynchronous sample rate converters Truly Evil - probably because they
> make the whole jitter discussion a non-issue, and in a simple way, so
> that can't be good.
>
> The answer to by SBGK's question (that no
Julf wrote:
> I agree with not drinking and typing, but how can you *read* an
> audiophile forum and not drink?
Consider the source. ;-)
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this
netchord wrote:
> I don't suffer from yours.
No reason why not.
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=104227
11 matches
Mail list logo
