Supercars however overpriced and impractical they are , has some
performance advantages .
If your koenigsegg or pagani performed just like a Honda Civic , then
the choice would be as irrational as jewelry cables ?
Actual jewelry is deliberately irrational and that's ok :) it's pure
look and
Thanks! You'll have to turn your private message option ON. Right now
its disabled.
Fizbin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58734
View this thread:
Fizbin wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up. I have two myself, and I don't even have a
> Transporter...yet.
>
> Any chance I can have your old PSU? (I'll pay you to ship it to me) I'd
> love to take a look at it with my magnifier. (If "yes", I'll PM you)
Sure - PM me your info and we can
Thanks for the heads up. I have two myself, and I don't even have a
Transporter...yet.
Any chance I can have your old PSU? (I'll pay you to ship it to me) I'd
love to take a look at it with my magnifier. (If "yes", I'll PM you)
Thanks for posting. I'm sure this will help some Transporter owner in
the future!
*Home:* VortexBox 4TB (2.3) > LMS 7.8 > Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio
(all ethernet)
*Cottage:* VBA 3TB (2.3) > LMS 7.8 > Touch > Benchmark DAC I, Boom,
Radio w/Battery (all ethernet except Radio)
*Office:*
Link to replacement power supply:
https://www.rapidonline.com/powerpax-uk-sw3376-mini-open-frame-psu-5vdc-2-3a-85-2251
mkbrucetx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=65854
View this thread:
For a couple of months, my Transporter would spuriously reboot itself as
if it had lost power completely - relays clicking, logo scrolling, etc.
Not finding anything directly relevant through Google searches other
than a vague reference to the DC power supply being a cheap Chinese
switcher, I
..can't see your .sig on the Tapatalk client, so I didn't know that..
But I also don't care why you bought your DAC.. you appear to be a grown
adult and it's therefore none of my business..
drmatt's Profile:
arnyk wrote:
>
> I've never had that problem, and over the years I've used all sorts of
> bottom-of-the-barrel cables including the ones that were in the box with
> the new gear I bought.
It's all personal choice. Myself, while I don't see the point of cables
that cost more than the equipment
drmatt wrote:
> Though maybe you have a very good DAC?
>
As my sig shows, I use a Benchmark DAC2 HGC as my reference, fed through
the Touch - of course that means that as a rule the 24/192 material is
down-sampled a tad. That said, I have also done tests sending files via
USB with Jriver Media
Having now downloaded and read the paper, I am concerned about the
criteria used to select which studies were included in the
meta-analysis. Unless I've missed something, all I can see is that
studies were selected based on the comparison methodology - ie. the
manner in which the redbook and
pablolie wrote:
> As to the same recording in 16/44 vs 24/192... nah.
Given that many DACs can't really resolve much more than 16 bits and you
can't hear above 20khz this is not a surprise. Though maybe you have a
very good DAC?
I think the study defines CD quality as 16/44 uncompressed (or
I was curious about the paper's definition, and came across this...
".. This can be transformed into an XY
test by assuming that correct discrimination is made when
24 bit / 192 kHz was rated higher than 16 bit / 44.1 kHz, and
incorrect discrimination if 24 bit / 192 kHz was rated lower
than 16
The key here is if they define "CD Quality" as hi-bitrate MP3 (256k+) or
an uncompressed CD. The article doesn't say (perhaps the study does).
I can differentiate between the two (although most of the time for
relaxed music listening I may not care much about the difference). As to
the same
14 matches
Mail list logo
