ralphpnj wrote:
> Well I for one enjoyed every bit of your wonderful post. You covered all
> of the points about digital audio that are most often misrepresented and
> backed up your statements with good solid scientific proof.
> Unfortunately science in the Age of Trump is down on one knee and
odw199 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A very interesting read, thank you to everyone who's clearly put time
> and thought into the research.
>
> A couple of questions from my rather naive (and very computer science
> orientated background). I ripped my CD collection to FLAC many years ago
> using Max on a
Davesworld wrote:
> Will anyone even remember MQA in a year?
Mostly likely no one except for the writers and editors at all the high
end audio magazines. Just remember that MQA + The Audioquest Jitterbug +
The Magic Clock is a match made in heaven.
Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power
Hi,
A very interesting read, thank you to everyone who's clearly put time
and thought into the research.
A couple of questions from my rather naive (and very computer science
orientated background). I ripped my CD collection to FLAC many years ago
using Max on a Mac (http://sbooth.org/Max/). I
Davesworld wrote:
> I know this is long and sounding like a rant
Well I for one enjoyed every bit of your wonderful post. You covered all
of the points about digital audio that are most often misrepresented and
backed up your statements with good solid scientific proof.
Unfortunately
